proxy-mcp (yfe404/proxy-mcp) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 74 out of 100, grade C. It declares 89 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

C
Caution
74/100
3 months ago

proxy-mcp

An HTTP/HTTPS MITM proxy server that enables capture, modification, and mocking of network traffic across Chrome, CLI tools, Docker containers, and Android devices. It supports advanced capabilities like JA3/JA4 TLS fingerprinting, JA3 spoofing, and upstream proxy chaining.

Caution. Specific findings reduced this grade. They are listed on the page. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

yfe404

Source: Glama

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

Install from

The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.

// key findings
⚠️
Tool descriptions don’t match what handlers do
1 tool describes read intent but its handler mutates — interceptor_browser_screenshot (line 169: mkdir(dirname(file_path), { recursive: true }))
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
// quality suggestions

Dependencies

12 dependencies, 1 flagged: playwright-core

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

89/89 tools missing one or more hints — interceptor_camoufox_launch (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); interceptor_camoufox_info (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); interceptor_camoufox_list (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +86 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Descriptions match behaviour

1 tool describes read intent but its handler mutates — interceptor_browser_screenshot (line 169: mkdir(dirname(file_path), { recursive: true }))

Rename the tool, rewrite the description, or move the side-effect into a separate clearly-named tool.

Tool inputs are validated

70/89 tool handlers declare input schemas (79%)

Declare an inputSchema with zod/joi/yup on every tool definition.

Tool handlers catch errors

73/89 tool handlers wrap calls in try/catch (82%)

Wrap each tool handler body in try/catch and return a structured error response.

License file

No license file

Add a LICENSE file (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.).

Tool test coverage

58/89 tools referenced in tests (65%)

Write tests that reference each tool by name so every tool has at least one test.

Shell command execution

5 child_process calls — runs shell commands

Prefer library functions over shell-outs. If you must shell out, ensure all inputs are properly escaped.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 8 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Verified](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/yfe404/proxy-mcp?variant=verified)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/yfe404/proxy-mcp)
Shows verification status without the grade. Want the grade badge instead? Remove ?variant=verified from the URL.
commit: ee1a8f7d51c0311526feadec19534b42090f74ee
code hash: b8ce85a240c91297a1dc3d09c356b1e1c26260b471876d8f5d053888f58a4901
verified: 6/12/2026, 11:32:19 AM
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client