mcp-feedback-ultra (YangHang0210/mcp-feedback-ultra) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. M8ven has not graded it yet. No publisher has claimed this listing.

Not scored
1 month ago

mcp-feedback-ultra

Interactive feedback server for AI-assisted development with Web UI and desktop app support, enabling user feedback collection after AI tasks.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

YangHang0210

Source: Glama

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

Install from

The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.

⏳ This MCP is queued for scoring. Check back in a few minutes.
// key findings
🚨
Code appears obfuscated
2 files are unreadable to a human reviewer. Cannot audit what they do.
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configFASTMCP_LOG_LEVEL
configSESSIONNAME
configDISPLAY
configMCP_FEEDBACK_TIMEOUT
configMCP_APPEND_REMINDER
configMCP_REMINDER_TEXT
configSSH_CONNECTION
configSSH_CLIENT
configVSCODE_INJECTION
configWSL_DISTRO_NAME
configWSL_INTEROP
configWSLENV
configMCP_DEBUG调试模式 false
configMCP_DESKTOP_MODE启用桌面应用模式 false
configPYTHONWARNINGS
configMCP_TEST_MODE
configMCP_WEB_HOSTWeb UI 绑定地址 127.0.0.1
configMCP_WEB_PORTWeb UI 端口 8765
configMCP_LANGUAGE
configMCP_GZIP_MIN_SIZE
configMCP_GZIP_LEVEL
configMCP_STATIC_CACHE_AGE
configMCP_API_CACHE_AGE
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

2/2 tools missing one or more hints — interactive_feedback (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); get_system_info (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint). OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Tool inputs are validated

1/2 tool handlers declare input schemas (50%)

Declare an inputSchema with zod/joi/yup on every tool definition.

Tool handlers catch errors

1/2 tool handlers wrap calls in try/catch (50%)

Wrap each tool handler body in try/catch and return a structured error response.

Tests exist

No test files found

Add tests that exercise each declared tool.

Shell command execution

34 child_process calls — runs shell commands

Prefer library functions over shell-outs. If you must shell out, ensure all inputs are properly escaped.

Readable source code

2 files appear obfuscated

Ship unminified, readable source.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 7 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Score](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/yanghang0210/mcp-feedback-ultra)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/yanghang0210/mcp-feedback-ultra)
Shows your grade and updates automatically. Prefer no grade? Append ?variant=verified to the badge URL.
commit: d8b719f2b17ed7199cb0bf8fb7b51aa4d9e35f84
code hash: 3fece62c4a67267f15d558d1f3f4731d9d8bf75f36cb2993e17a7de1343c8499
verified: 8/6/2026, 3:01:15 PM
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client