Back to MCP Trust Indexm8ven
D
Warning
52/100
1 day ago

Prediction-Examples-in-the-Alink-Tutorial

Two prediction examples in the Alink tutorial: input a year to predict GMV; input a piece of feedback to analyze its sentiment (positive/negative).

→ xiaobenyang-com/1804079084099594· listed on glama

Warning. Serious findings were identified. Review the full report before connecting. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

xiaobenyang-com

Source: Glama

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

⚡ Connect GitHub for Live Monitored

Install from

Glama

M8ven verifies MCPs across every public registry — install directly from whichever one you prefer.

// key findings
🚨
Secret credentials may flow to a network call
1 flow detected: XBY_APIKEY. We can’t prove the destination matches the brand the credential belongs to.
⚠️
Known vulnerabilities in dependencies: 3 high
Affects packages this MCP installs at runtime. Upgrade or remove the affected dependency.
🔐
You'll be asked for 1 credential: XBY_APIKEY
These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.
// known CVEs in dependencies3 high1 medium

Disclosed vulnerabilities in this server's declared npm dependencies (via OSV). Whether each is reachable depends on the installed versions.

high@modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.25.1GHSA-345p-7cg4-v4c7

@modelcontextprotocol/sdk has cross-client data leak via shared server/transport instance reuse

high@modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.25.1GHSA-8r9q-7v3j-jr4g

Anthropic's MCP TypeScript SDK has a ReDoS vulnerability

higheffect@3.19.13GHSA-38f7-945m-qr2g

Effect `AsyncLocalStorage` context lost/contaminated inside Effect fibers under concurrent load with RPC

mediumvalibot@1.2.0GHSA-5qjj-4xww-7phc

Valibot: record() issue paths can make flatten() throw for inherited Object property names

Depend on this server? Get alerted when its CVEs change.Watch this server free →
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
🔐 secretXBY_APIKEY"": "<YOUR_XBY_APIKEY>",
Deployment configuration, supplied by whoever hosts the server. Users are not asked for these.
deployPORT
// quality suggestions

Tests exist

No test files found

Add tests that exercise each declared tool.

Secrets stay with their owner

1 secret/sensitive value flow into network calls (XBY_APIKEY → mcp.xiaobenyang.com)

Audit where credentials are sent. A NOTION_TOKEN should only reach api.notion.com — never a third-party host.

Secrets not logged

1 secret value sent to console.log

Redact or omit secret values from log output.

Production dependencies are patched

0 critical, 3 high severity in production deps — @modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.25.1 (high), @modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.25.1 (high)

Run npm audit fix, or upgrade the affected packages to a non-vulnerable version.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 4 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Verified](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/xiaobenyang-com-1804079084099594-1p87ce?variant=verified)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/xiaobenyang-com-1804079084099594-1p87ce)
Shows verification status without the grade. Want the grade badge instead? Remove ?variant=verified from the URL.
commit: 47928d1e72daa721eb8375bbed94553308414e99
code hash: 09768ef44714806064acee13dd3e7c96205c1064e9f56e28429549d167f6fdb5
verified: 8/18/2026, 7:38:01 PM
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client