Wbrowser (w-partners/Wbrowser) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 74 out of 100, grade C. It declares 10 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

Back to MCP Trust IndexM8ven
C
Emerging
74/100
11 days ago

Wbrowser

Enables AI assistants and terminals to control a user's already logged-in Chrome session, allowing them to navigate pages, read content, click and type, run JavaScript, and inspect console or network activity.

→ w-partners/Wbrowser· listed on glama

Emerging. No concerning findings. Grades remain capped until the project builds reputation through adoption. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

w-partners

Source: Glama

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

⚡ Connect GitHub for Live Monitored

Install from

Glamanot scored here

The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.

// key findings
✅
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
✅
Open source with a license and README
Anyone can audit the code, the license is declared, and the publisher documents what it does.
🔐
You'll be asked for 1 credential: WBROWSER_MCP_TOKEN
These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configWBROWSER_AGENT
configWBROWSER_BROWSER_NUM
configWBROWSER_CDP
configWBROWSER_CDP_PORTChrome debugging port
configWBROWSER_CHROMEWBROWSER_CHROME=/path/to/chrome ./wb up
configWBROWSER_ENGINE
configWBROWSER_HEADLESS1 or =0. Note you can't log in by hand without a screen —
configWBROWSER_JOBS
🔐 secretWBROWSER_MCP_TOKENRequired for remote MCP
configWBROWSER_NOTESDirectory for daily work logs (optional)
configWBROWSER_PORTControl engine port
configWBROWSER_PROFILEProfile name within it
configWBROWSER_PROFILE_DIRls /mnt/c/Users to find yours, then<br>WBROWSER_PROFILE_DIR=/mnt/c/Users/<you>/.wbrowser ./wb up
configWBROWSER_STATE_DIR
configWBROWSER_WINDOW_SIZE
configXDG_STATE_HOME
configWIN_ACCOUNT_RESOLVED
configWIN_AGENTlike no agent being present. Set it explicitly with =<name>.
// quality suggestions

Dependencies

2 runtime dependencies, 1 flagged: playwright

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

10/10 tools missing one or more hints — browser_open (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); browser_read (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); browser_click (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +7 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Tool test coverage

Only 0/10 tools referenced in tests (0%)

Write tests that reference each tool by name so every tool has at least one test.

Shell command execution

1 call in production code run through a shell (engine.js:597)

Prefer library functions over shell-outs. If you must shell out, ensure all inputs are properly escaped.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 4 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Score](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/w-partners/wbrowser)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/w-partners/wbrowser)
Shows your grade and updates automatically. Prefer no grade? Append ?variant=verified to the badge URL.
commit: 7cea85de4a8a5e11b552f7aba712117e628063b2
code hash: b6e842b23d0db749c7867738904f335fc34fce01a4b76d76ae7be93f76d44d78
verified: 9/1/2026, 5:13:21 PM
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client