GitHub PR Review MCP Server
Comprehensive MCP server for analyzing GitHub pull requests, detecting security vulnerabilities, assessing code quality, and providing risk ratings across multiple languages.
Caution. Specific findings reduced this grade. They are listed on the page. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.
How we verified
Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.
⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →Who stands behind it
Vibe-Code-Agent
Source: Glama
Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →
Install from
The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.
These names and descriptions are the publisher's own, read from the source code. We print them as written. Our assessment is the findings above, not this list.
get_pull_requestFetch pull request details including metadata and file changes
review_pull_requestComprehensive review of a pull request including code analysis, issue detection, and security checks
analyze_code_diffAnalyze specific code changes for issues and security vulnerabilities
get_repository_prsList pull requests for a repository with filtering options
Disclosed vulnerabilities in this server's declared npm dependencies (via OSV). Whether each is reachable depends on the installed versions.
@modelcontextprotocol/sdk has cross-client data leak via shared server/transport instance reuse
Anthropic's MCP TypeScript SDK has a ReDoS vulnerability
Model Context Protocol (MCP) TypeScript SDK does not enable DNS rebinding protection by default
Axios is Vulnerable to Denial of Service via __proto__ Key in mergeConfig
Axios: Header Injection via Prototype Pollution
COPILOT_MODELGITHUB_TOKENexport =your_github_personal_access_tokenTool annotations
No tools have read-only/destructive annotations
Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.
All four hints declared on every tool
4/4 tools missing one or more hints — get_pull_request (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); review_pull_request (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); analyze_code_diff (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +1 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.
For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.
Tests exist
No test files found
Add tests that exercise each declared tool.
Production dependencies are patched
0 critical, 8 high severity in production deps — @modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.22.0 (high), @modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.22.0 (high)
Run npm audit fix, or upgrade the affected packages to a non-vulnerable version.
Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.
[](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/vibe-code-agent/github-review)?variant=verified from the URL.Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.
https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check