Back to MCP Trust Indexm8ven
F
Warning
26/100
5 days ago

ContextBridge

A security-first MCP gateway that enables AI assistants to safely inspect and interact with GitHub repositories through a controlled, auditable tool layer with policy enforcement and human approval for mutations.

→ Vatsal212005/ContextBridge· listed on glama

Warning. Serious findings were identified. Review the full report before connecting. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

Vatsal212005

Source: Glama

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

⚡ Connect GitHub for Live Monitored

Install from

Glama

M8ven verifies MCPs across every public registry — install directly from whichever one you prefer.

// key findings
🚨
Code appears obfuscated
1 file are unreadable to a human reviewer. Cannot audit what they do.
🔐
You'll be asked for 5 credentials: GITHUB_TOKEN, CONTEXTBRIDGE_DASHBOARD_TOKEN, OPENAI_API_KEY, GEMINI_API_KEY, OLLAMA_API_KEY
These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configCONTEXTBRIDGE_TRANSPORT
🔐 secretGITHUB_TOKEN
configGITHUB_API_URL
🔐 secretCONTEXTBRIDGE_DASHBOARD_TOKEN
configCONTEXTBRIDGE_LLM_PROVIDER
🔐 secretOPENAI_API_KEY
🔐 secretGEMINI_API_KEY
🔐 secretOLLAMA_API_KEY
configCONTEXTBRIDGE_DB_PATH
configCONTEXTBRIDGE_NAME
configCONTEXTBRIDGE_ENV
configCONTEXTBRIDGE_LOG_LEVEL
configCONTEXTBRIDGE_HOST
configGITHUB_API_VERSION
configCONTEXTBRIDGE_DASHBOARD_HOST
configCONTEXTBRIDGE_LLM_MODEL
configOPENAI_BASE_URL
configOLLAMA_BASE_URL
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

54/54 tools missing one or more hints — server_info (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); health (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); github_connection_status (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +51 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Tool test coverage

27/54 tools referenced in tests (50%)

Write tests that reference each tool by name so every tool has at least one test.

Readable source code

1 file appear obfuscated

Ship unminified, readable source.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 4 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Verified](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/vatsal212005-contextbridge-1f21ka?variant=verified)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/vatsal212005-contextbridge-1f21ka)
Shows verification status without the grade. Want the grade badge instead? Remove ?variant=verified from the URL.
commit: f9958a9633a4ef58066bab5a03ea58dc15d78d51
code hash: 6a9604e668f8645ff574627e2c1d52caa10868010b76219e2846039abee64dac
verified: 8/14/2026, 9:49:00 AM
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client