mcp-server (usegranthq/mcp-server) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 72 out of 100, grade C. It declares 26 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

Back to MCP Trust IndexM8ven
C
Caution
72/100

mcp-server

A Model Context Protocol server that provides tools for managing providers, clients, tenants, and access tokens through the UseGrant platform.

→ usegranthq/mcp-server· listed on modelscope

Caution. Specific findings reduced this grade. They are listed on the page. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

usegranthq

Source: ModelScope

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

⚡ Connect GitHub for Live Monitored

Install from

ModelScopenot scored here

The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.

// key findings
⚠️
Known vulnerabilities in dependencies: 2 high
Affects packages this MCP installs at runtime. Upgrade or remove the affected dependency.
✅
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
✅
Open source with a license and README
Anyone can audit the code, the license is declared, and the publisher documents what it does.
🔐
You'll be asked for 1 credential: USEGRANT_API_KEY
These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.
// tools this server exposes26 tools

These names and descriptions are the publisher's own, read from the source code. We print them as written. Our assessment is the findings above, not this list.

list_providers

List all providers

create_provider

Create a new provider

get_provider

Get a provider by ID

delete_provider

Delete a provider

list_clients

List all clients

create_client

Create a new client for a provider

get_client

Get client details by provider and client ID

delete_client

Delete a client from a provider

list_domains

List all domains for a provider

add_domain

Add a domain to a provider

get_domain

Get a domain by provider and domain ID

delete_domain

Delete a domain from a provider

verify_domain

Verify a domain for a provider

create_access_token

Create a new access token for a client

list_tenants

List all tenants

create_tenant

Create a new tenant

get_tenant

Get a tenant by ID

delete_tenant

Delete a tenant

list_tenant_providers

List all providers for a tenant

create_tenant_provider

Create a new provider for a tenant

get_tenant_provider

Get a provider for a tenant

delete_tenant_provider

Delete a provider for a tenant

list_tenant_provider_policies

List all policies for a tenant provider

create_tenant_provider_policy

Create a new policy for a tenant provider

get_tenant_provider_policy

Get a policy for a tenant provider

delete_tenant_provider_policy

Delete a policy for a tenant provider

// known CVEs in dependencies2 high

Disclosed vulnerabilities in this server's declared npm dependencies (via OSV). Whether each is reachable depends on the installed versions.

high@modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.7.0GHSA-8r9q-7v3j-jr4g

Anthropic's MCP TypeScript SDK has a ReDoS vulnerability

high@modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.7.0GHSA-w48q-cv73-mx4w

Model Context Protocol (MCP) TypeScript SDK does not enable DNS rebinding protection by default

Depend on this server? Get alerted when its CVEs change.Watch this server free →
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
🔐 secretUSEGRANT_API_KEY"": "your_api_key_here"
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

26/26 tools missing one or more hints — list_providers (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); create_provider (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); get_provider (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +23 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Tool inputs are validated

Only 1/26 tool handlers declare input schemas (4%)

Declare an inputSchema with zod/joi/yup on every tool definition.

Tests exist

No test files found

Add tests that exercise each declared tool.

Production dependencies are patched

0 critical, 2 high severity in production deps — @modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.7.0 (high), @modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.7.0 (high)

Run npm audit fix, or upgrade the affected packages to a non-vulnerable version.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 5 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Verified](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/usegranthq/mcp-server?variant=verified)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/usegranthq/mcp-server)
Shows verification status without the grade. Want the grade badge instead? Remove ?variant=verified from the URL.
commit: 02545e9434f1b122b89531162cbe0deb737f8895
code hash: 6bbfd6571a2548cb7d034b487767f4116f11c4f79e6b498d6d15ed996a745df6
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client