adhack (Ultraviolet-Chikorita/adhack) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 74 out of 100, grade C. It declares 10 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.
Emerging. No concerning findings. Grades remain capped until the project builds reputation through adoption. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.
How we verified
Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.
⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →Who stands behind it
Ultraviolet-Chikorita
Source: github_code
Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →
Install from
The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.
These names and descriptions are the publisher's own, read from the source code. We print them as written. Our assessment is the findings above, not this list.
evaluate_placement_wasteUpsert placement metrics, evaluate ROAS/CPA waste policy, and auto-pause clear losers with traceable rationale.
score_intent_toolScore prompt for buy intent in conversational ad channel.
evaluate_bid_toolEvaluate whether a bid can be committed under active guardrails.
generate_creatives_toolGenerate ad creative variants under brand context.
judge_creative_toolJudge creative against brand-safety and claim-grounding guardrails.
evaluate_waste_toolUpsert placement metrics and evaluate waste policy.
pause_placement_toolPause an active placement manually with a reason.
get_pending_approvals_toolList pending approval items for human-in-the-loop queue.
get_trace_toolGet recent supervision traces.
run_seeded_demo_toolRun the seeded end-to-end demo scenario.
GUARDRAIL_API_BASEOPENAI_API_KEYWithout , explicit blocked terms can still fail deterministically, but otherwise creative judgement is escalated to human review rather than passed.TAVILY_API_KEYWithout , claim checking falls back to local heuristics; this should be treated as a demo mode, not equivalent evidence quality.MODEL_NAMEBRAND_NAMEOVERMIND_API_KEYOVERMIND_SERVICE_NAMEOVERMIND_ENVIRONMENTDAILY_BUDGET_CEILINGPLACEMENT_BID_CAPSPEND_SPIKE_THRESHOLDSPIKE_WINDOWMIN_BID_INTENTBASE_BIDBID_MULTIPLIERROAS_FLOORBORDERLINE_ROAS_TOLERANCEMIN_IMPRESSIONS_FOR_WASTEMCP_HOSTMCP_PORTMCP_API_BASEAPI_BASE_URLTool annotations
1/10 tools have annotations
Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.
All four hints declared on every tool
10/10 tools missing one or more hints — evaluate_placement_waste (missing: idempotentHint); score_intent_tool (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); evaluate_bid_tool (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +7 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.
For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.
License file
No license file
Add a LICENSE file (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.).
Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.
[](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/ultraviolet-chikorita/adhack)?variant=verified to the badge URL.Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.
https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check