Generative-AI-with-LLMs
Warning. Serious findings were identified. Review the full report before connecting. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.
How we verified
Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.
⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →Who stands behind it
thundergod-zenitsu
Source: github_code
Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →
Install from
The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.
These names and descriptions are the publisher's own, read from the source code. We print them as written. Our assessment is the findings above, not this list.
search_papersSearch for papers on arXiv based on a topic and store their information. Args: topic: The topic to search for max_results: Maximum number of results to retrieve (default: 5) Returns: List of paper IDs found in the search
extract_infoSearch for information about a specific paper across all topic directories. Args: paper_id: The ID of the paper to look for Returns: JSON string with paper information if found, error message if not found
search_articlesSearch for articles on Wikipedia based on a topic and store their information. Args: topic: The topic to search for max_results: Maximum number of results to retrieve (default: 5) Returns: List of article titles found in the search
get_article_contentGet the full content of a Wikipedia article. Args: article_title: The title of the article to retrieve Returns: String with article content if found, error message if not found
RetrieveSupplierChunksRetrieve related supplier clause chunks.
MergeSupplierChunksMerge and clean retrieved supplier chunks into a final clause.
CompareClauseVersionsHighlight textual differences between template and supplier clause.
AZURE_OPENAI_API_KEYOPENAI_API_VERSIONAZURE_OPENAI_ENDPOINTOPENAI_API_KEYTool annotations
No tools have read-only/destructive annotations
Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.
All four hints declared on every tool
27/27 tools missing one or more hints — search_papers (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); extract_info (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); search_articles (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +24 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.
For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.
Descriptions match behaviour
10 tools describe read intent but their handlers mutate — search_papers (line 64: with open(file_path, "w") as json_file:); search_articles (line 54: with open(articles_file, 'w', encoding='utf-8') as f:); search_articles (line 60: with open(articles_file, 'w', encoding='utf-8') as f:)
Rename the tool, rewrite the description, or move the side-effect into a separate clearly-named tool.
Tool handlers catch errors
22/24 tool handlers wrap calls in try/catch (92%)
Wrap each tool handler body in try/catch and return a structured error response.
License file
No license file
Add a LICENSE file (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.).
Tests exist
No test files found
Add tests that exercise each declared tool.
Tool description accuracy
10 tools have description/behavior mismatches: search_papers: description implies read-only but handler writes/deletes/executes; search_articles: description implies read-only but handler writes/deletes/executes; search_articles: description implies read-only but handler writes/deletes/executes
Update tool descriptions to accurately reflect all capabilities — especially write, delete, or execute operations.
Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.
[](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/thundergod-zenitsu/generative-ai-with-llms)?variant=verified from the URL.Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.
https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check