archify-mcp (Tai-DT/archify-mcp) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 58 out of 100, grade D. It declares 26 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

D
Caution
58/100

archify-mcp

Analyzes project ideas and recommends suitable tech stacks, features, and architecture patterns.

Caution. Specific findings reduced this grade. They are listed on the page. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

Tai-DT

Source: Glama

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

Install from

The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.

// key findings
⚠️
Known vulnerabilities in dependencies: 3 high
Affects packages this MCP installs at runtime. Upgrade or remove the affected dependency.
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
// tools this server exposes26 tools

These names and descriptions are the publisher's own, read from the source code. We print them as written. Our assessment is the findings above, not this list.

analyze_project

Deep analysis of a project idea including market insights, risks, MVP scope, technical requirements, AND environment/device/performance analysis. Supports Vietnamese.

recommend_stack

Recommend the best technology stack considering deployment environment, target devices, network conditions, and infrastructure constraints. Scores 40+ technologies across 8 criteria + environment fit.

suggest_features

Suggest features for a project organized by priority (Must-Have, Should-Have, Could-Have, Innovative). Includes complexity estimates and tech requirements.

compare_tech

Compare 2 or more technologies side-by-side across 8 scoring criteria. Generates a ranking table with winner.

design_architecture

Design system architecture with Mermaid diagrams, component breakdown, deployment strategy, and scaling plan.

estimate_project

Estimate project timeline, team composition, and costs based on features and scale.

generate_roadmap

Generate a development roadmap with Gantt chart, milestones, and critical path.

estimate_infrastructure

Estimate monthly infrastructure costs with scaling projections and provider comparisons. Checks free tiers and budget caps.

design_database

Design database schema with ER diagrams, table definitions, indexes, and recommendations. Templates for e-commerce, SaaS, and more.

audit_security

Audit security of a tech stack against OWASP Top 10. Includes compliance checks (GDPR, HIPAA, PCI-DSS), scoring, and actionable checklist.

migrate_stack

Plan a technology migration: compare old vs new stack, risk assessment, phased migration steps with rollback plans, and GO/NO-GO recommendation.

generate_boilerplate

Generate config files (.env, docker-compose, Dockerfile, CI/CD, .gitignore) based on the recommended tech stack.

recommend_dual_stack

Recommend TWO stacks side-by-side: Module (SaaS/SDK plug-in, nhanh) vs Standard (self-build, full control). Includes comparison table, advantages, cost/time differences, and hybrid recommendation.

full_analysis

COMPLETE closed-loop analysis pipeline. Runs ALL tools in sequence: Project Analysis → Features → Stack → Architecture → Database → Security → Cost → Estimation → Roadmap → Boilerplate. Produces a comprehensive report with GO/NO-GO verdict.

design_api

Design REST API endpoints based on project type and features. Generates endpoint tables, auth requirements, webhooks, rate limiting, and recommendations.

plan_testing

Create comprehensive testing strategy: test pyramid, tool recommendations, coverage targets, performance testing plan, CI integration, and setup checklist.

analyze_scalability

Plan scaling from MVP to 1M users. Includes 4 growth stages, bottleneck predictions (DB, API, WebSocket, AI), caching strategy by layer, and database scaling phases.

assess_team

Assess required team: roles, skills, hiring plan, salary ranges (VN/US), organization structure, and skill gap analysis.

plan_devops

Plan DevOps strategy: CI/CD pipeline (GitHub Actions), monitoring (Sentry/Grafana), alerting rules, disaster recovery (RTO/RPO/backup), environment setup, and secret management.

map_integrations

Map all third-party services needed: costs, free tiers, API keys, alternatives, vendor lock-in. Feature-aware: adds AI, chat, video, analytics services.

generate_ui_spec

Generate UI/UX specification: design system (colors, typography, spacing), component inventory with variants/states, page layouts, responsive strategy, accessibility checklist (WCAG AA).

create_performance_budget

Set performance budget: Core Web Vitals targets, bundle size limits, Lighthouse scores, network/server budgets, and optimization strategies.

plan_monetization

Plan monetization: revenue model, pricing tiers, break-even analysis, business KPIs (MRR, CAC, LTV, churn), and pricing recommendations.

smart_recommend

Advanced tech recommendation using TOPSIS ranking + AHP weighting + Constraint Satisfaction. Returns ranked alternatives with confidence score, sensitivity analysis, and breakdown.

analyze_compatibility

Analyze compatibility between technologies using graph-based synergy/conflict detection. Shows +3 (perfect synergy) to -3 (incompatible) scores for each tech pair.

simulate_cost

Monte Carlo simulation for cost/timeline estimation under uncertainty. Uses PERT/triangular distributions. Returns P10 (optimistic), P50 (likely), P90 (pessimistic) with histogram.

// known CVEs in dependencies3 high

Disclosed vulnerabilities in this server's declared npm dependencies (via OSV). Whether each is reachable depends on the installed versions.

high@modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.12.1GHSA-345p-7cg4-v4c7

@modelcontextprotocol/sdk has cross-client data leak via shared server/transport instance reuse

high@modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.12.1GHSA-8r9q-7v3j-jr4g

Anthropic's MCP TypeScript SDK has a ReDoS vulnerability

high@modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.12.1GHSA-w48q-cv73-mx4w

Model Context Protocol (MCP) TypeScript SDK does not enable DNS rebinding protection by default

Depend on this server? Get alerted when its CVEs change.Watch this server free →
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

26/26 tools missing one or more hints — analyze_project (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); recommend_stack (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); suggest_features (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +23 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Tool handlers catch errors

Only 0/26 tool handlers wrap calls in try/catch (0%)

Wrap each tool handler body in try/catch and return a structured error response.

License file

No license file

Add a LICENSE file (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.).

Tests exist

No test files found

Add tests that exercise each declared tool.

Production dependencies are patched

0 critical, 3 high severity in production deps — @modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.12.1 (high), @modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.12.1 (high)

Run npm audit fix, or upgrade the affected packages to a non-vulnerable version.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 6 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Verified](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/tai-dt/archify-mcp?variant=verified)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/tai-dt/archify-mcp)
Shows verification status without the grade. Want the grade badge instead? Remove ?variant=verified from the URL.
commit: c38b1535b7ebb09a2ef69296a123a28f0dc3f529
code hash: 4f76e8346790b139481c13e7554b797515d28be4fece7389341a423b7893f549
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client