nanomcp (szfmsmdx/nanomcp) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 74 out of 100, grade C. It declares 3 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

Back to MCP Trust IndexM8ven
C
Emerging
74/100
7 days ago

nanomcp

A minimal MCP server demo written without the MCP Python SDK that demonstrates the complete protocol flow. It provides weather, file search, and datetime tools, and includes a CLI client that bridges MCP tools with OpenAI function calling.

→ szfmsmdx/nanomcp· listed on glama

Emerging. No concerning findings. Grades remain capped until the project builds reputation through adoption. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

szfmsmdx

Source: Glama

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

⚡ Connect GitHub for Live Monitored

Install from

Glamanot scored here

The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.

// key findings
🚨
Secret credentials may flow to a network call
2 flows detected: OPENAI_API_KEY. We can’t prove the destination matches the brand the credential belongs to.
🔐
You'll be asked for 1 credential: OPENAI_API_KEY
These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configNANOMCP_LIVE_WEATHER
configNANOMCP_TIMEZONE
configNANOMCP_FILE_ROOT
🔐 secretOPENAI_API_KEY如果 chat 输出 OpenAI API quota is exhausted (429 insufficient_quota)，意思是模型 API 拒绝了请求：当前 所属项目没有可用额度或 billing 没开通。这不是 MCP server 失败，因为请求在模型返回 tool call 之前就被拒绝了。
configOPENAI_BASE_URL
configNANOMCP_MODEL
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

3/3 tools missing one or more hints — get_weather (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); find_files (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); get_current_datetime (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint). OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

License file

No license file

Add a LICENSE file (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.).

Secrets not logged

1 secret value sent to print

Redact or omit secret values from log output.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 4 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Score](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/szfmsmdx/nanomcp)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/szfmsmdx/nanomcp)
Shows your grade and updates automatically. Prefer no grade? Append ?variant=verified to the badge URL.
commit: a5c68b89c4a07526cef8da8a0cb7ae6d2162ebc2
code hash: 45e9de02a20e6b78b8dfdac15e128dd55b6bdcda0e07fbfcbef44341f46503d9
verified: 9/6/2026, 7:08:24 AM
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client