Pursers (swisspra/Pursers) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 74 out of 100, grade C. It declares 88 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

Emerging

74/100

Pursers

Item: Pursers
Rating: 74
Author: M8ven

Local, single-owner coordination board for AI agents: durable shared state, cross-agent work relay, human-governed automation, and verifiable decisions with evidence. Successor to On Board.

→ swisspra/Pursers · listed on github_repo_search

Emerging. No concerning findings. Grades remain capped until the project builds reputation through adoption. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every push why connect →

Who stands behind it

swisspra

Source: github_repo_search

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

⚡ Connect GitHub for Live Monitored

Install from

GitHub

The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.

// key findings

✅

No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation

Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.

✅

Open source with a license and README

Anyone can audit the code, the license is declared, and the publisher documents what it does.

🔐

You'll be asked for 1 credential: ONBOARD_CENTRAL_TOKEN

These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.

// environment variables

To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.

configONBOARD_CENTRAL_URL

🔐 secretONBOARD_CENTRAL_TOKEN

configONBOARD_BOARD_ID

configPURSERS_ROLE

configONBOARD_CENTRAL_TOKEN_FILE

configONBOARD_AGENT_NAME

configONBOARD_AGENT_INSTANCE

configPURSERS_WAIT_MODE

configPURSERS_BACKLOG_RESURFACE_INTERVAL_S

configPURSERS_BRIDGE_STATS

configPURSERS_BRIDGE_STATE

configPURSERS_BRIDGE_STATE_DIR

configPURSERS_HOST_TIMEOUT_S

configPURSERS_HOST

configPURSERS_TIER_MAX

configPURSERS_SKILLS

configPURSERS_CENTRAL_CONNECTION_CAP

configPURSERS_LEGACY_TOOLS

configPURSERS_REQUIRE_TOKEN_MATCH

configPURSERS_BOARDS

configPURSERS_KEEPALIVE_IDLE_LIMIT_S

configPURSER_LEAK_MARKERS_FILE

configPURSERS_COORDINATOR_TOKEN_PATH

configONBOARD_TOKEN_FILE

configPURSERS_COORDINATOR_INTAKE_TOKEN_PATH

configPURSERS_PRIVACY_TERMS

configPURSERS_DOORS_KEYS_DIR

configPURSERS_JWKS_PATH

configPURSERS_CENTRAL_PROFILE_ENV

configPURSERS_CENTRAL_PYTHON

configSHELL

configSSL_CERT_FILE

configPURSERS_BOARD

configPURSERS_DOCTOR_TOKEN_PATH

configPURSERS_STALE_SECONDS

configPROJECT_REGISTRY_FILE

configSTORE_BACKEND

configCENTRAL_ADMISSION

configCENTRAL_AUTH_MODE

configCENTRAL_JWT_ISSUER

configCENTRAL_JWT_AUDIENCE

configCENTRAL_JWKS_PATH

configCENTRAL_JWT_CLOCK_SKEW

configCENTRAL_REAPER_INTERVAL_S

// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

88/88 tools missing one or more hints — project_registry_get (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); board_digest (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); board_digest_ack (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +85 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Tool test coverage

64/88 tools referenced in tests (73%)

Write tests that reference each tool by name so every tool has at least one test.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail

The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.

// improvement guidance — verified publishers only

We have 3 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.

// embed badge in your README

[![M8ven Score](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/swisspra/pursers)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/swisspra/pursers)

Shows your grade and updates automatically. Prefer no grade? Append ?variant=verified to the badge URL.

commit: 54b008e9dbbd210cedd97583c35decfceaf42088

code hash: 00d45411bd8877efbee3df62d549836485256854b8fd7dd3e784ba0dc4cc2384

view raw JSON →

Check MCPs from inside your assistant

Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check

check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern

How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client