SSW Workforce Intelligence MCP (sugukurukabe/ssw-workforce-intel-mcp) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 56 out of 100, grade D. It declares 17 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

Back to MCP Trust IndexM8ven
D
Caution
56/100

SSW Workforce Intelligence MCP

Enables workforce and labor market analysis for Specified Skilled Workers in Japan by aggregating public census data to provide regional and industry insights, labor supply-demand gaps, competitive landscape, and wage trends.

→ sugukurukabe/ssw-workforce-intel-mcp· listed on glama

Caution. Specific findings reduced this grade. They are listed on the page. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

sugukurukabe

Source: Glama

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

⚡ Connect GitHub for Live Monitored

Install from

Glamanot scored here

The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.

// key findings
🚨
Known vulnerabilities in dependencies: 2 critical, 6 high
Affects packages this MCP installs at runtime. Upgrade or remove the affected dependency.
🔐
You'll be asked for 1 credential: INTEL_MCP_BEARER_TOKEN
These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.
// tools this server exposes17 tools

These names and descriptions are the publisher's own, read from the source code. We print them as written. Our assessment is the findings above, not this list.

intel_compare_kyushu_prefectures
intel_competitor_intel
intel_find_branch_candidates_v2
intel_find_business_opportunities
intel_find_subsidies_for_employer
intel_forecast_ssw_demand
intel_generate_insight_article
intel_get_agricultural_output
intel_get_decision_brief
intel_get_indonesian_supply
intel_get_minimum_wage_premium
intel_get_regional_dashboard
intel_get_sending_org_capacity
intel_get_wage_by_industry_tenure
intel_get_wage_by_industry
intel_get_wage_by_visa_status
intel_validate_hypothesis
// known CVEs in dependencies2 critical6 high24 low

Disclosed vulnerabilities in this server's declared npm dependencies (via OSV). Whether each is reachable depends on the installed versions.

criticalvitest@2.1.0GHSA-5xrq-8626-4rwp

When Vitest UI server is listening, arbitrary file can be read and executed

criticalvitest@2.1.0GHSA-9crc-q9x8-hgqq

Vitest allows Remote Code Execution when accessing a malicious website while Vitest API server is listening

high@modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.0.0GHSA-w48q-cv73-mx4w

Model Context Protocol (MCP) TypeScript SDK does not enable DNS rebinding protection by default

highhono@4.6.0GHSA-3vhc-576x-3qv4

Hono JWK Auth Middleware has JWT algorithm confusion when JWK lacks "alg" (untrusted header.alg fallback)

highhono@4.6.0GHSA-88fw-hqm2-52qc

hono: CORS Middleware reflects any Origin with credentials when `origin` defaults to the wildcard

Depend on this server? Get alerted when its CVEs change.Watch this server free →
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configESTAT_APP_IDe-Stat API Application ID (optional, falls back to local CSVs if omitted).
configGCS_CACHE_BUCKET
configHOST
🔐 secretINTEL_MCP_BEARER_TOKEN
configLOG_LEVEL
configPUBLIC_MCP_JP_GATEWAY_URL
configSLACK_WEBHOOK_URLOptional Slack webhook for error alerts.
Deployment configuration, supplied by whoever hosts the server. Users are not asked for these.
deployPORT
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

4/17 tools have annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

17/17 tools missing one or more hints — intel_compare_kyushu_prefectures (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); intel_competitor_intel (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); intel_find_branch_candidates_v2 (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +14 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Tool inputs are validated

15/17 tool handlers declare input schemas (88%)

Declare an inputSchema with zod/joi/yup on every tool definition.

Production dependencies are patched

0 critical, 6 high severity in production deps — @modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.0.0 (high), hono@4.6.0 (high)

Run npm audit fix, or upgrade the affected packages to a non-vulnerable version.

Dev dependencies

2 critical/high in dev-only deps (does not ship to users)

Upgrade dev dependencies when convenient.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 5 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Verified](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/sugukurukabe/ssw-workforce-intel-mcp?variant=verified)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/sugukurukabe/ssw-workforce-intel-mcp)
Shows verification status without the grade. Want the grade badge instead? Remove ?variant=verified from the URL.
commit: fbcc533c7a71a32b761d72ea57a09b6eddc2eb15
code hash: b72b5debd407c2120e8b66436fa106b5dd56103f0fe0294bdf87f7c05bbc9241
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client