ASM MCP Materials Platform (sudhanshubliz/asm-mcp-materials-platform) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. M8ven has not graded it: we have no way to read this server ourselves. No publisher has claimed this listing.

Limited view

71/100

1 month ago

ASM MCP Materials Platform

Item: ASM MCP Materials Platform
Rating: 71
Author: M8ven

Enables querying and retrieving materials data from the Materials Project via MCP tools, supporting search, lookup, comparison, and export.

→ sudhanshubliz/asm-mcp-materials-platform · listed on glama

Limited view. Automated analysis covers part of this stack. Findings reflect what we verified. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

Limited view: static analysis for Python is partially covered.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every push why connect →

Who stands behind it

sudhanshubliz

Source: Glama

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

⚡ Connect GitHub for Live Monitored

Install from

Glama

M8ven verifies MCPs across every public registry — install directly from whichever one you prefer.

// key findings

✅

No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation

Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.

🔐

You'll be asked for 2 credentials: MATERIALS_API_KEY, QDRANT_API_KEY

These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.

// environment variables

To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.

configAPP_NAME

configAPP_VERSION

configLOG_LEVEL

configSQL_MAX_ROWS

configMATERIALS_API

configMATERIALS_SUMMARY_PATH/materials/summary

configMATERIALS_API_KEY_HEADER

configMATERIALS_API_MODE

🔐 secretMATERIALS_API_KEYyour_materials_project_key

configOQMD_API

configOQMD_RESOURCEformationenergy

configOQMD_REQUIRED

configREDIS_HOST

configREDIS_PORT

configCACHE_TTL_SECONDS

configQDRANT_URL

configVECTOR_DB

🔐 secretQDRANT_API_KEY

configQDRANT_INFERENCE_MODEL

configQDRANT_COLLECTION

configRAG_COLLECTION

configRAG_TOP_K

configREQUEST_TIMEOUT

configREQUEST_RETRY_ATTEMPTS

configREQUEST_RETRY_BACKOFF

configMCP_TRANSPORTexport =http

configMCP_HOSTexport =0.0.0.0

configMCP_PORTexport =8000

configMCP_PATH

configMCP_REQUIRE_AUTH

configMCP_PUBLISH_METADATA

configCORS_ALLOWED_ORIGINS

Deployment configuration, supplied by whoever hosts the server. Users are not asked for these.

deploySQL_CONNECTION_STRING

deployPORT

deployAPP_INSIGHTS_CONNECTION_STRING

// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

7/7 tools missing one or more hints — search_material_tool (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); search_materials_advanced_tool (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); get_material_by_id_tool (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +4 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

License file

No license file

Add a LICENSE file (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.).

Tests exist

No test files found

Add tests that exercise each declared tool.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail

The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.

// improvement guidance — verified publishers only

We have 4 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.

// embed badge in your README

[![M8ven Score](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/sudhanshubliz-asm-mcp-materials-platform-g6uzgl)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/sudhanshubliz-asm-mcp-materials-platform-g6uzgl)

Shows your grade and updates automatically. Prefer no grade? Append ?variant=verified to the badge URL.

commit: 4ce93b31dd3337570fbc20fd92f5bff02fc13c28

code hash: a37f22ba1cda0dfad20e242c24ca13868e2ff0dfd500a7a608557e1e852045ac

verified: 8/7/2026, 4:32:44 AM

view raw JSON →

Check MCPs from inside your assistant

Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check

check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern

How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client