multi-ai-hub (Star-957/multi-ai-hub) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 74 out of 100, grade C. It declares 15 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

C
Emerging
74/100
2 months ago

multi-ai-hub

Privacy-first local MCP hub for coordinating multiple AI providers from Claude Code, supporting local Ollama seats and cloud providers with safety routing.

Emerging. No concerning findings. Grades remain capped until the project builds reputation through adoption. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

Star-957

Source: Glama

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

Install from

M8ven verifies MCPs across every public registry — install directly from whichever one you prefer.

// key findings
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
Open source with a license and README
Anyone can audit the code, the license is declared, and the publisher documents what it does.
🔐
You'll be asked for 10 credentials: ANTHROPIC_API_KEY, CEREBRAS_API_KEY, GEMINI_API_KEY, GLM_API_KEY, GROQ_API_KEY, MISTRAL_API_KEY, NVIDIA_API_KEY, OPENAI_API_KEY, OPENROUTER_API_KEY, ZAI_API_KEY
These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
🔐 secretANTHROPIC_API_KEY
configANTHROPIC_MODEL
🔐 secretCEREBRAS_API_KEY
configCEREBRAS_BASE_URL
configCEREBRAS_MODEL
configCLAUDE_CLI_PATH
configCLAUDE_EFFORT
configCLAUDE_TRANSPORT
🔐 secretGEMINI_API_KEY
configGEMINI_MODEL
🔐 secretGLM_API_KEY
configGLM_BASE_URL
configGLM_MODEL
🔐 secretGROQ_API_KEY
configGROQ_BASE_URL
configGROQ_MODEL
configHOST
🔐 secretMISTRAL_API_KEY
configMISTRAL_BASE_URL
configMISTRAL_MODEL
configMULTI_AI_ROOT
🔐 secretNVIDIA_API_KEY
configNVIDIA_BASE_URL
configNVIDIA_MODELmeta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct
configOLLAMA_DEEPSEEK_MODEL
configOLLAMA_FAST_MODEL
configOLLAMA_MODEL
configOLLAMA_URL
🔐 secretOPENAI_API_KEY
configOPENAI_IMAGE_ENABLED
configOPENAI_IMAGE_MODEL
configOPENAI_MODEL
🔐 secretOPENROUTER_API_KEY
configOPENROUTER_BASE_URL
configOPENROUTER_MODEL
🔐 secretZAI_API_KEY
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

15/15 tools missing one or more hints — ask_openai (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); ask_gemini (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); ask_ollama (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +12 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Tool inputs are validated

Only 2/15 tool handlers declare input schemas (13%)

Declare an inputSchema with zod/joi/yup on every tool definition.

Tool handlers catch errors

14/15 tool handlers wrap calls in try/catch (93%)

Wrap each tool handler body in try/catch and return a structured error response.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 4 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Score](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/star-957/multi-ai-hub)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/star-957/multi-ai-hub)
Shows your grade and updates automatically. Prefer no grade? Append ?variant=verified to the badge URL.
commit: e53599b914fa06dd12494b0a3cebfba3fbacc236
code hash: 4c030f8c96ef0ee8be287c6ce775beeab2705dc691b9866d81d99288f00d7e67
verified: 7/1/2026, 10:01:51 AM
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client