C
Limited view
67/100
2 months ago

FEAT NEXUS PRIME

An institutional-grade algorithmic trading platform that bridges MetaTrader 5 with an autonomous AI cortex for high-frequency data extraction, ML-driven analysis, and autonomous decision-making using the FEAT methodology.

Limited view. Automated analysis covers part of this stack. Findings reflect what we verified. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

Limited view: static analysis for Python is partially covered.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

SrAndres629

Source: Glama

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

Install from

M8ven verifies MCPs across every public registry — install directly from whichever one you prefer.

// key findings
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
🔐
You'll be asked for 1 credential: N8N_API_KEY
These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configOTEL_CONSOLE_EXPORT
configLOG_LEVEL
configDATA_DIR
configN_LOOKAHEAD
configPROFIT_THRESHOLD
configBATCH_SIZE
configFLUSH_INTERVAL
configFEAT_VECTOR_CONFIG
configN8N_WEBHOOK_URL
🔐 secretN8N_API_KEY
Deployment configuration, supplied by whoever hosts the server. Users are not asked for these.
deployNEXT_PUBLIC_SUPABASE_ANON_KEY
deployNEXT_PUBLIC_SUPABASE_URL
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

2/2 tools missing one or more hints — skill_run_unified_analysis (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); skill_get_analysis_report (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint). OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Tool inputs are validated

1/2 tool handlers declare input schemas (50%)

Declare an inputSchema with zod/joi/yup on every tool definition.

Tool handlers catch errors

1/2 tool handlers wrap calls in try/catch (50%)

Wrap each tool handler body in try/catch and return a structured error response.

License file

No license file

Add a LICENSE file (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.).

Tests exist

No test files found

Add tests that exercise each declared tool.

Shell command execution

9 child_process calls — runs shell commands

Prefer library functions over shell-outs. If you must shell out, ensure all inputs are properly escaped.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 7 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Score](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/srandres629-feat-sniper-mcp-lxt9bk)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/srandres629-feat-sniper-mcp-lxt9bk)
Shows your grade and updates automatically. Prefer no grade? Append ?variant=verified to the badge URL.
commit: 41d3e5735a16c09e37d61fe467309fe603a13b46
code hash: 333918e34dd39737a2e1025ff300c84e271619489fe37697dcdd83dafd8ca7b8
verified: 6/22/2026, 12:55:22 PM
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client