Codex MCP Server
Connects AI assistants to a local Codex engine for performing deep, project-level code reviews and automated refactoring. It enables context-aware bug fixes and multi-file analysis through a standardized bridge between modern AI clients and local development environments.
Caution. Specific findings reduced this grade. They are listed on the page. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.
How we verified
Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.
⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →Who stands behind it
SpongeBaby-124
Source: Glama
Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →
Install from
The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.
These names and descriptions are the publisher's own, read from the source code. We print them as written. Our assessment is the findings above, not this list.
review_project【核心工具】审查整个项目的代码。适用于跨文件夹修改、系统级重构或需要全面上下文的情况。Codex 将分析项目结构和代码，根据提供的变更描述进行审查和修复。
review_file【次要工具】审查单个文件的内容。适用于改动仅在单个或两个文件内的情况。Codex 将读取文件并根据变更描述提供审查建议。
review_code_changes【通用工具】将代码或文本发送给 Codex 代理进行审查、修改和验证。Codex 将分析代码，执行必要的编辑或命令，并返回修复摘要。每次 Gemini 修改代码后，应该调用此工具获取 Codex 的审查意见。
continue_review【会话工具】在现有会话中继续讨论。用于追问 Codex 更多细节或请求进一步的修改建议。
Disclosed vulnerabilities in this server's declared npm dependencies (via OSV). Whether each is reachable depends on the installed versions.
@modelcontextprotocol/sdk has cross-client data leak via shared server/transport instance reuse
Anthropic's MCP TypeScript SDK has a ReDoS vulnerability
Tool annotations
No tools have read-only/destructive annotations
Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.
All four hints declared on every tool
4/4 tools missing one or more hints — review_project (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); review_file (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); review_code_changes (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +1 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.
For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.
License file
No license file
Add a LICENSE file (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.).
Tests exist
No test files found
Add tests that exercise each declared tool.
Shell command execution
1 call in production code run through a shell (src/index.ts:53)
Prefer library functions over shell-outs. If you must shell out, ensure all inputs are properly escaped.
Production dependencies are patched
0 critical, 2 high severity in production deps — @modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.24.3 (high), @modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.24.3 (high)
Run npm audit fix, or upgrade the affected packages to a non-vulnerable version.
Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.
[](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/spongebaby-124/codexreviewermcp)?variant=verified from the URL.Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.
https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check