SupaThings MCP (soycanopa/SupaThings-MCP) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 47 out of 100, grade D. It declares 37 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

D
Caution
47/100

SupaThings MCP

SupaThings MCP is a macOS server that enables AI agents to read and manage Things 3 data by combining SQLite-based queries with official URL-scheme commands. It provides over 30 tools for project structural analysis and task placement, allowing agents to understand and interact with tasks while maintaining safe interoperability.

Caution. Specific findings reduced this grade. They are listed on the page. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

soycanopa

Source: Glama · also listed on github_topic

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

Install from

The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.

// key findings
⚠️
Tool descriptions don’t match what handlers do
18 tools describe read intent but their handlers mutate — get-areas (line 336: db.exec("PRAGMA query_only = ON")); get-tags (line 336: db.exec("PRAGMA query_only = ON")); get-projects (line 336: db.exec("PRAGMA query_only = ON"))
⚠️
Known vulnerabilities in dependencies: 3 high
Affects packages this MCP installs at runtime. Upgrade or remove the affected dependency.
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
Open source with a license and README
Anyone can audit the code, the license is declared, and the publisher documents what it does.
// tools this server exposes37 tools

These names and descriptions are the publisher's own, read from the source code. We print them as written. Our assessment is the findings above, not this list.

app-status
get-areas
get-tags
get-projects
get-headings
suggest-headings
validate-headings
get-todos
get-inbox
get-today
get-upcoming
get-anytime
get-someday
get-logbook
get-trash
get-tagged-items
get-recent
search-todos
search-items
search-advanced
get-project-structure
suggest-task-placement
summarize-project
version
show-quick-entry
log-completed
empty-trash
add-todo
create-project-with-headings
add-project
update
update-project
show
show-item
search
json
update-todo
// known CVEs in dependencies3 high

Disclosed vulnerabilities in this server's declared npm dependencies (via OSV). Whether each is reachable depends on the installed versions.

high@modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.12.1GHSA-345p-7cg4-v4c7

@modelcontextprotocol/sdk has cross-client data leak via shared server/transport instance reuse

high@modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.12.1GHSA-8r9q-7v3j-jr4g

Anthropic's MCP TypeScript SDK has a ReDoS vulnerability

high@modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.12.1GHSA-w48q-cv73-mx4w

Model Context Protocol (MCP) TypeScript SDK does not enable DNS rebinding protection by default

Depend on this server? Get alerted when its CVEs change.Watch this server free →
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configTHINGSDB
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

37/37 tools missing one or more hints — app-status (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); get-areas (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); get-tags (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +34 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Descriptions match behaviour

18 tools describe read intent but their handlers mutate — get-areas (line 336: db.exec("PRAGMA query_only = ON")); get-tags (line 336: db.exec("PRAGMA query_only = ON")); get-projects (line 336: db.exec("PRAGMA query_only = ON"))

Rename the tool, rewrite the description, or move the side-effect into a separate clearly-named tool.

Tool inputs are validated

36/37 tool handlers declare input schemas (97%)

Declare an inputSchema with zod/joi/yup on every tool definition.

Tests exist

No test files found

Add tests that exercise each declared tool.

Production dependencies are patched

0 critical, 3 high severity in production deps — @modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.12.1 (high), @modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.12.1 (high)

Run npm audit fix, or upgrade the affected packages to a non-vulnerable version.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 6 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Verified](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/soycanopa/supathings-mcp?variant=verified)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/soycanopa/supathings-mcp)
Shows verification status without the grade. Want the grade badge instead? Remove ?variant=verified from the URL.
commit: 0d556e690d142b8ee9be0812355f9e65f0adede5
code hash: 6c3d917a009e776f6b7a34991753d605e0f1ce640a21bb2e821f9c7766e56f0c
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client