SoDam-SeoMedic (sodam-ai/SoDam-SeoMedic) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 66 out of 100, grade C. It declares 9 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

C
Caution
66/100

SoDam-SeoMedic

Claude Code 플러그인 — 웹사이트 SEO/GEO 진단(크롤·렌더·CWV·구조화데이터·AI크롤러정책·회귀감지) + GSC/GA4/PSI 연동. Next.js 프로젝트 승인 기반 자동수정(canonical·OG·noindex·robots·JSON-LD·제목·메타설명) + GitHub 저장소 PR 제안(실험적)

Caution. Specific findings reduced this grade. They are listed on the page. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

sodam-ai

Source: github_repo_search

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

Install from

The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.

// key findings
⚠️
Known vulnerabilities in dependencies: 2 high
Affects packages this MCP installs at runtime. Upgrade or remove the affected dependency.
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
Open source with a license and README
Anyone can audit the code, the license is declared, and the publisher documents what it does.
// tools this server exposes9 tools

These names and descriptions are the publisher's own, read from the source code. We print them as written. Our assessment is the findings above, not this list.

seomedic_audit

URL(또는 사이트)을 크롤+렌더링해 raw/rendered 신호 차이·CWV·규칙 위반을 진단하고 Markdown 리포트를 반환합니다. 분석 전용(소스 미수정).

seomedic_save_baseline

가장 최근에 실행한 seomedic_audit 결과를 회귀 비교 기준(베이스라인)으로 저장합니다. 새로 진단을 다시 돌리지 않고, 이미 있는 최근 감사 결과를 그대로 기준점으로 삼습니다. 사용자가 명시적으로 요청했을 때만 호출하세요(자동 저장 금지).

seomedic_check

저장된 베이스라인 대비 원복(regression)을 확인합니다. 베이스라인이 없으면 먼저 seomedic_save_baseline이 필요합니다.

seomedic_fix_plan

로컬 Next.js 프로젝트를 대상으로 로컬 서버를 기동해 진단하고, '없는 것 추가'(add_safe)는 자동 계획, 색인·표시에 영향을 주는 변경(gated)은 승인 대기로 계획만 만듭니다(파일 미수정, dry-run). git 상태가 clean이 아니면 거부합니다.

seomedic_fix_approve

seomedic_fix_plan이 만든 gated(승인 대기) fix를 승인합니다. pending 상태가 아니면(이미 처리됨) 변경되지 않습니다.

seomedic_fix_reject

seomedic_fix_plan이 만든 gated(승인 대기) fix를 거부합니다(적용되지 않음). pending 상태가 아니면 변경되지 않습니다.

seomedic_fix_apply

seomedic_fix_plan에서 auto(add_safe) 또는 승인된 fix를 실제 파일에 반영합니다. 적용 후 `next build`로 재검증하고, 실패하면 그 fix만 자동으로 롤백합니다. git 상태가 clean이 아니면 거부합니다.

seomedic_fix_rollback

이미 적용된 fix를 apply 시점의 백업 파일로 되돌립니다.

seomedic_fix_github

GitHub 저장소를 대상으로 수정 사항을 브랜치에 반영해 PR을 생성합니다(제안, main 직접 push·자동 머지 없음 — PR 자체가 승인 절차이며, 병합 여부는 저장소 관리자가 직접 결정합니다). 위험도별로 PR을 2개까지 분리해서 만듭니다 — 무해한 추가(add_safe)만 담은 PR과, 색인·표시에 영향을 주는(gated, canonical·OG·noindex·robots.ts 등) 항목만 담은 PR을 따로 열어, 저장소 관리자가 안전한 것부터 바로 검토하고 중요한 것은 diff를 더 신중히 볼 수 있게 합니다(2026-

// known CVEs in dependencies2 high5 low

Disclosed vulnerabilities in this server's declared npm dependencies (via OSV). Whether each is reachable depends on the installed versions.

highfast-xml-parser@5.9.3GHSA-8r6m-32jq-jx6q

fast-xml-parser: Repeated DOCTYPE declarations reset entity expansion limits

highundici@8.6.0GHSA-4cwx-7wf7-3272

undici vulnerable to cross-user information disclosure and parse-time crash via degenerate private cache directives

lowundici@8.6.0GHSA-8xcm-r25x-g524

undici vulnerable to downstream response desynchronization via retry interceptor

lowundici@8.6.0GHSA-jr45-8vmc-qm54

undici vulnerable to cross-user information disclosure via whitespace around equals in Cache-Control directives

lowundici@8.6.0GHSA-m8rv-5g2x-5cg5

undici vulnerable to CRLF Injection via blob-like body 'type' property

Depend on this server? Get alerted when its CVEs change.Watch this server free →
// quality suggestions

Dependencies

14 runtime dependencies (4 dev), 1 flagged: playwright

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

9/9 tools missing one or more hints — seomedic_audit (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); seomedic_save_baseline (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); seomedic_check (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +6 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

No arbitrary install scripts

Has postinstall/preinstall script — runs arbitrary code on npm install

Remove postinstall/preinstall hooks unless they’re essential.

Production dependencies are patched

0 critical, 2 high severity in production deps — fast-xml-parser@5.9.3 (high), undici@8.6.0 (high)

Run npm audit fix, or upgrade the affected packages to a non-vulnerable version.

Dependency freshness

2/14 production deps stale: tree-kill@2022-06-27 (4.2y), robots-parser@2023-02-21 (3.6y)

Domain consistency

npm scope @seomedic doesn't match GitHub owner sodam-ai

Use the same org name across GitHub, npm, and your homepage so users can verify the publisher.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 5 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Verified](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/sodam-ai/sodam-seomedic?variant=verified)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/sodam-ai/sodam-seomedic)
Shows verification status without the grade. Want the grade badge instead? Remove ?variant=verified from the URL.
commit: c82b1d2810965c8005bf3ba466215a9c5c730095
code hash: 40f508561dd1be9fec90e225f60544bc4a3ab6c64abcc1f26fd686ff86cac455
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client