AIWorkHub (shrec/AIWorkHub) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 74 out of 100, grade C. It declares 164 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

Emerging

74/100

7 days ago

AIWorkHub

Item: AIWorkHub
Rating: 74
Author: M8ven

Open-source, local-first control plane for multi-model AI coding agents in VS Code and MCP: task DAGs, source intelligence, durable context and evidence-based review.

→ shrec/AIWorkHub · listed on github_code

Emerging. No concerning findings. Grades remain capped until the project builds reputation through adoption. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every push why connect →

Who stands behind it

shrec

Source: github_code

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

⚡ Connect GitHub for Live Monitored

Install from

GitHub

M8ven verifies MCPs across every public registry — install directly from whichever one you prefer.

// key findings

✅

No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation

Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.

✅

Open source with a license and README

Anyone can audit the code, the license is declared, and the publisher documents what it does.

// environment variables

To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.

configAIWORKHUB_VSCODE_LM_BRIDGE_ROOT

configPYTHONPATH

configAIWORKHUB_MCP_STDIO_BACKEND

configAIWORKHUB_REPO_ROOT

configAIWORKHUB_REPO

configAIWORKHUB_ALLOW_WRITESseparate and AIWORKHUB_ALLOW_LAUNCH gates, both

configAIWORKHUB_DEBUG_TRACE_FILE

configAIWORKHUB_CODEX_INNER_SANDBOX_MODE

configAIWORKHUB_CLAUDE_AUTH_STATE_FILE

configAIWORKHUB_TIMEOUT

configAIWORKHUB_WINDOW_ID

configCODEX_INTERNAL_ORIGINATOR_OVERRIDE

configCODEX_THREAD_ID

configVSCODE_IPC_HOOK_CLI

configVSCODE_ESM_ENTRYPOINT

configVSCODE_AGENT_FOLDER

configAIWORKHUB_AUDIT_LOG_PATH

configAIWORKHUB_CALLBACK_TRANSPORT

configXDG_DATA_HOME

configAIWORKHUB_SUITE_PROFILE_OUTPUT

// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

164/164 tools missing one or more hints — aiworkhub_manager_source_graph_query (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); aiworkhub_worker_source_graph_query (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); aiworkhub_manager_semantic_edit_prepare (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +161 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Tool test coverage

119/164 tools referenced in tests (73%)

Write tests that reference each tool by name so every tool has at least one test.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail

The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.

// improvement guidance — verified publishers only

We have 3 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.

// embed badge in your README

[![M8ven Score](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/shrec/aiworkhub)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/shrec/aiworkhub)

Shows your grade and updates automatically. Prefer no grade? Append ?variant=verified to the badge URL.

commit: 936e6c353e1e26f0078436e35d19727a566fee82

code hash: 7271555e2f2d82e65735ae064fe4196b0045a4c2741322f23d886d4eb0ff10dc

verified: 9/3/2026, 7:37:17 PM

view raw JSON →

Check MCPs from inside your assistant

Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check

check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern

How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client