NIST CSF 2.0 Assessment Platform (rocklambros/nist-csf-2-mcp-server) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 46 out of 100, grade D. It declares 49 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

Warning

46/100

NIST CSF 2.0 Assessment Platform

Item: NIST CSF 2.0 Assessment Platform
Rating: 46
Author: M8ven

Enables comprehensive NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 assessments with 40+ MCP tools for maturity scoring, gap analysis, implementation planning, risk assessment, and executive reporting across 740 security questions.

→ rocklambros/nist-csf-2-mcp-server · listed on glama

Warning. Serious findings were identified. Review the full report before connecting. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every push why connect →

Who stands behind it

rocklambros

Source: Glama

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

⚡ Connect GitHub for Live Monitored

Install from

Glamanot scored here

The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.

// key findings

🚨

Reads files from sensitive locations

Touches: tsconfig.docker.json, tsconfig.docker.json, tsconfig.docker.json

🚨

Code appears obfuscated

2 files are unreadable to a human reviewer. Cannot audit what they do.

⚠️

Known vulnerabilities in dependencies: 2 high

Affects packages this MCP installs at runtime. Upgrade or remove the affected dependency.

🔐

You'll be asked for 1 credential: API_KEY

These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.

// tools this server exposes49 tools

These names and descriptions are the publisher's own, read from the source code. We print them as written. Our assessment is the findings above, not this list.

query_framework

Query NIST CSF 2.0 framework elements

get_element

Get a specific CSF element by ID

get_implementation_examples

Get implementation examples for a subcategory

create_organization

Create a new organization profile

record_implementation

Record subcategory implementation status

record_risk

Record risk assessment for an element

record_gap

Record gap analysis for a category

get_assessment

Get assessment data for a profile

get_framework_stats

Get framework and database statistics

csf_lookup

Retrieve specific CSF guidance with partial matching support

search_framework

Full-text search across the CSF framework with fuzzy matching

get_related_subcategories

Find related subcategories and analyze relationships

create_profile

Create new organization and security profile

clone_profile

Duplicate an existing profile with modifications

quick_assessment

Interactive cybersecurity assessment - presents questions for each CSF function and collects real user responses. Call with only profile_id to see questions, then call again with your answers.

assess_maturity

Calculate maturity tier for each CSF function

calculate_risk_score

Calculate risk score based on unimplemented subcategories

calculate_maturity_trend

Analyze historical assessments and calculate maturity trends

generate_gap_analysis

Generate comprehensive gap analysis between current and target profiles

generate_priority_matrix

Generate 2x2 priority matrix for gap remediation planning

create_implementation_plan

Generate phased implementation roadmap with dependencies

estimate_implementation_cost

Calculate detailed cost breakdown for implementation

suggest_next_actions

Recommend prioritized actions based on available capacity

track_progress

Track implementation progress for NIST CSF subcategories with UPSERT operations

get_industry_benchmarks

Compare organization against industry benchmarks and peer organizations

generate_report

Generate formatted reports for NIST CSF assessments and progress

compare_profiles

Compare multiple profiles to identify differences and similarities

export_data

Export profile assessment data in various formats

import_assessment

Import assessment data from CSV, Excel, or JSON files

validate_evidence

Validate and store evidence files for assessments

get_implementation_template

Generate detailed implementation guide for NIST CSF subcategories

generate_policy_template

Generate policy document templates based on NIST CSF subcategories

generate_test_scenarios

Generate validation test cases for NIST CSF subcategories

get_assessment_questions

Retrieve comprehensive assessment questions based on NIST CSF 2.0 subcategories with context-aware customization

validate_assessment_responses

Validate assessment responses for completeness, consistency, and data integrity with comprehensive error reporting

get_question_context

Retrieve detailed context, guidance, and examples for specific NIST CSF assessment questions with sector and size-specific recommendations

reset_organizational_data

start_assessment_workflow

Start a comprehensive NIST CSF 2.0 assessment workflow with proper data collection

check_assessment_workflow_status

Check the status of an assessment workflow

persistent_comprehensive_assessment

Manage comprehensive assessment with persistent progress tracking. Resume assessments across sessions and save progress after each question.

create_custom_report

Create custom cybersecurity reports with flexible templates and content

generate_audit_report

Generate comprehensive audit reports for cybersecurity assessments

generate_compliance_report

Generate comprehensive compliance reports for regulatory frameworks

generate_dashboard

Generate cybersecurity dashboard with metrics and visualizations

generate_executive_report

Generate executive cybersecurity reports for leadership audiences

generate_milestone

Generate milestones for cybersecurity implementation progress

get_implementation_guidance

Get detailed implementation guidance for NIST CSF controls

track_audit_trail

Track audit trail for all system activities

upload_evidence

Upload evidence files to support cybersecurity control implementation

// known CVEs in dependencies2 high1 low

Disclosed vulnerabilities in this server's declared npm dependencies (via OSV). Whether each is reachable depends on the installed versions.

high@modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.24.3GHSA-345p-7cg4-v4c7

@modelcontextprotocol/sdk has cross-client data leak via shared server/transport instance reuse

high@modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.24.3GHSA-8r9q-7v3j-jr4g

Anthropic's MCP TypeScript SDK has a ReDoS vulnerability

lowuuid@11.1.0GHSA-w5hq-g745-h8pq

uuid: Missing buffer bounds check in v3/v5/v6 when buf is provided

Depend on this server? Get alerted when its CVEs change.Watch this server free →

// environment variables

To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.

configANALYTICS_FLUSH_INTERVAL

configANALYTICS_MAX_HISTORY

🔐 secretAPI_KEY

configCORS_ORIGIN

configCORS_ORIGINS

configDATABASE_PATH

configENABLE_AUTH

configENABLE_CORS

configENABLE_MONITORING

configENABLE_RATE_LIMITING

configENABLE_SECURITY_HEADERS

configFORCE_TERMINATE

configHTTP_PORT

configJWKS_URL

configLOG_FORMAT

configLOG_LEVEL

configMAX_REQUEST_SIZE

configMCP_AUDIENCE

configMCP_SERVER

configMETRICS_FLUSH_INTERVAL

configMETRICS_MAX_POINTS

configRATE_LIMIT

configSERVER_HOST

configSERVER_PORT

configTOKEN_ISSUER

configUSE_MONITORED_DB

// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

49/49 tools missing one or more hints — query_framework (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); get_element (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); get_implementation_examples (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +46 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

License file

No license file

Add a LICENSE file (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.).

No access to sensitive paths

Reads sensitive paths: tsconfig.docker.json, tsconfig.docker.json, tsconfig.docker.json

Remove reads of sensitive system paths. If you genuinely need them, document why in the README.

Shell command execution

3 calls in production code run through a shell (build-docker.cjs:63, build-docker.cjs:71, src/utils/instance-manager.ts:105)

Prefer library functions over shell-outs. If you must shell out, ensure all inputs are properly escaped.

Readable source code

2 files are minified or bundled, which is usually build output rather than concealment

Ship unminified, readable source.

Production dependencies are patched

0 critical, 2 high severity in production deps — @modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.24.3 (high), @modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.24.3 (high)

Run npm audit fix, or upgrade the affected packages to a non-vulnerable version.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail

The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.

// improvement guidance — verified publishers only

We have 7 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.

// embed badge in your README

[![M8ven Verified](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/rocklambros/nist-csf-2-mcp-server?variant=verified)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/rocklambros/nist-csf-2-mcp-server)

Shows verification status without the grade. Want the grade badge instead? Remove ?variant=verified from the URL.

commit: 05fe1cb74b8114985c2c3920094805df77b06d98

code hash: 5973dedddb181e7a9b8706abc8043c9bc6b37dd5d0d809a394f38a75435cae48

view raw JSON →

Check MCPs from inside your assistant

Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check

check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern

How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client