PersonalLeetcodeMCP (RishiSarraff/PersonalLeetcodeMCP) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 74 out of 100, grade C. It declares 8 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

Back to MCP Trust IndexM8ven
C
Emerging
74/100

PersonalLeetcodeMCP

Enables Claude to fetch and analyze your public LeetCode submission history, weak areas, and daily challenge via a remote MCP server.

→ RishiSarraff/PersonalLeetcodeMCP· listed on glama

Emerging. No concerning findings. Grades remain capped until the project builds reputation through adoption. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

RishiSarraff

Source: Glama

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

⚡ Connect GitHub for Live Monitored

Install from

Glamanot scored here

The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.

// key findings
✅
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
🔐
You'll be asked for 1 credential: CSRF_TOKEN
These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.
// tools this server exposes8 tools

These names and descriptions are the publisher's own, read from the source code. We print them as written. Our assessment is the findings above, not this list.

get_submission_history

Fetch recent submission history for a LeetCode user

analyze_weak_areas

Analyze a LeetCode user's weak topic areas and provide recommendations

get_user_stats

Get overall stats and progress for a LeetCode user

get_daily_challenge

Get today's LeetCode Daily Challenge problem

search_problems_by_topic

Search Leetcode problems by Topic Tag and/or Difficulty

get_problem_details

Get the full details of a specific LeetCode problem

get_similar_problems

Get the Similar Problems of a specific LeetCode problem

recommend_next_problem

Leetcode's recommendation the Next Challenges after a specific LeetCode problem

// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
🔐 secretCSRF_TOKEN
configLEETCODE_SESSION
Deployment configuration, supplied by whoever hosts the server. Users are not asked for these.
deployPORT
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

8/8 tools missing one or more hints — get_submission_history (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); analyze_weak_areas (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); get_user_stats (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +5 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Tool inputs are validated

7/8 tool handlers declare input schemas (88%)

Declare an inputSchema with zod/joi/yup on every tool definition.

License file

No license file

Add a LICENSE file (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.).

Tests exist

No test files found

Add tests that exercise each declared tool.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 5 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Score](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/rishisarraff/personalleetcodemcp)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/rishisarraff/personalleetcodemcp)
Shows your grade and updates automatically. Prefer no grade? Append ?variant=verified to the badge URL.
commit: 3d48e43ed9ebedf114a8644139b57942867e6dc3
code hash: 3f37b6ed356af6ee7e75c1eb9959478bd7368a898b41fa4f88c62085f2f522c9
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client