Baekjoon MCP Server (ri7116/Baekjoon-mcp) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 56 out of 100, grade D. It declares 8 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

D
Caution
56/100

Baekjoon MCP Server

Analyzes Baekjoon Online Judge problems and provides hints, answers, test cases, and code refactoring suggestions.

Caution. Specific findings reduced this grade. They are listed on the page. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

ri7116

Source: Glama

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

Install from

The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.

// key findings
⚠️
Known vulnerabilities in dependencies: 12 high
Affects packages this MCP installs at runtime. Upgrade or remove the affected dependency.
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
// tools this server exposes4 tools

These names and descriptions are the publisher's own, read from the source code. We print them as written. Our assessment is the findings above, not this list.

hint

백준 문제 ID를 받아 문제의 핵심 아이디어와 알고리즘 분류 힌트를 제공합니다. 정답 코드는 제공하지 않습니다.

answer

백준 문제 ID를 받아 문제 분석, 복잡도 계산, 그리고 C++ 및 JavaScript로 작성된 최적의 정답 코드를 제공합니다.

testcase

백준 문제 ID를 받아 기본 예제 외에 엣지 케이스를 포함한 추가 테스트 케이스 3~5개를 생성합니다.

refactor

백준 문제 ID와 사용자 코드를 받아, 코드 스타일, 가독성, 효율성을 분석하고 개선된 리팩토링 코드를 제안합니다.

// known CVEs in dependencies12 high6 medium12 low

Disclosed vulnerabilities in this server's declared npm dependencies (via OSV). Whether each is reachable depends on the installed versions.

high@modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.25.2GHSA-345p-7cg4-v4c7

@modelcontextprotocol/sdk has cross-client data leak via shared server/transport instance reuse

highaxios@1.13.2GHSA-35jp-ww65-95wh

axios Vulnerable to Full Man-in-the-Middle via Prototype Pollution Gadget in `config.proxy`

highaxios@1.13.2GHSA-3g43-6gmg-66jw

axios Vulnerable to Credential Theft and Response Hijacking via Prototype Pollution Gadget in Config Merge

highaxios@1.13.2GHSA-43fc-jf86-j433

Axios is Vulnerable to Denial of Service via __proto__ Key in mergeConfig

highaxios@1.13.2GHSA-6chq-wfr3-2hj9

Axios: Header Injection via Prototype Pollution

Depend on this server? Get alerted when its CVEs change.Watch this server free →
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

8/8 tools missing one or more hints — hint (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); answer (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); testcase (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +5 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

License file

No license file

Add a LICENSE file (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.).

Tests exist

No test files found

Add tests that exercise each declared tool.

Production dependencies are patched

0 critical, 12 high severity in production deps — @modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.25.2 (high), axios@1.13.2 (high)

Run npm audit fix, or upgrade the affected packages to a non-vulnerable version.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 5 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Verified](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/ri7116/baekjoon-mcp?variant=verified)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/ri7116/baekjoon-mcp)
Shows verification status without the grade. Want the grade badge instead? Remove ?variant=verified from the URL.
commit: 0721a67ea06eeb2ca92abb6b9dd64ec04f9a8693
code hash: 9037025eca15c124d579934ae48a158122eda539b9cbc038304757c20652c564
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client