codexpro (rebel0789/codexpro) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 74 out of 100, grade C. No publisher has claimed this listing.

Back to MCP Trust IndexM8ven
C
Emerging
74/100

codexpro

Use ChatGPT Developer Mode as a local coding agent for your repo through MCP.

→ rebel0789/codexpro· listed on github_repo_search

Emerging. No concerning findings. Grades remain capped until the project builds reputation through adoption. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

rebel0789

Source: github_repo_search

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

⚡ Connect GitHub for Live Monitored

Install from

GitHub

The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.

// key findings
✅
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
✅
Open source with a license and README
Anyone can audit the code, the license is declared, and the publisher documents what it does.
🔐
You'll be asked for 4 credentials: CODEBASE_BRIDGE_HTTP_TOKEN, CODEXPRO_ALLOW_NO_HTTP_TOKEN, CODEXPRO_HTTP_TOKEN, CODEXPRO_REQUIRE_HTTP_TOKEN
These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configCODEBASE_BRIDGE_ALLOWED_ROOTS
🔐 secretCODEBASE_BRIDGE_HTTP_TOKEN
configCODEBASE_BRIDGE_REPO_ROOT
configCODEXPRO_ALLOWED_ROOTS
configCODEXPRO_ALLOW_HOME
🔐 secretCODEXPRO_ALLOW_NO_HTTP_TOKEN
configCODEXPRO_ANALYSIS
configCODEXPRO_ANALYSIS_MAX_ANALYZED_FILES
configCODEXPRO_ANALYSIS_MAX_INVENTORY_FILES
configCODEXPRO_ANALYSIS_MAX_RELATIONSHIPS
configCODEXPRO_ANALYSIS_MAX_SCANNED_BYTES
configCODEXPRO_ANALYSIS_MAX_SYMBOLS
configCODEXPRO_BASH_EXECUTABLE
configCODEXPRO_BASH_MODE
configCODEXPRO_BASH_RUNTIME
configCODEXPRO_BASH_SESSION_ID
configCODEXPRO_BASH_TRANSCRIPT
configCODEXPRO_BLOCKED_GLOBS
configCODEXPRO_CODEX_DIR
configCODEXPRO_CODEX_SESSIONS
configCODEXPRO_CONNECTION_TEST
configCODEXPRO_CONTEXT_DIR
configCODEXPRO_EXPOSE_ABSOLUTE_PATHS
configCODEXPRO_GIT_EXECUTABLE
configCODEXPRO_HOME
configCODEXPRO_HOST
configCODEXPRO_HOSTNAME
configCODEXPRO_HTTP_SESSION_TTL_MS
🔐 secretCODEXPRO_HTTP_TOKEN
configCODEXPRO_INHERIT_ENV
configCODEXPRO_LOG_REQUESTS
configCODEXPRO_LOG_TOOL_CALLS
configCODEXPRO_MAX_BASH_TIMEOUT_MS
configCODEXPRO_MAX_HTTP_SESSIONS
configCODEXPRO_MAX_IMPORT_BYTES
configCODEXPRO_MAX_OUTPUT_BYTES
configCODEXPRO_MAX_READ_BYTES
configCODEXPRO_MAX_SEARCH_RESULTS
configCODEXPRO_MAX_WRITE_BYTES
configCODEXPRO_MODE
configCODEXPRO_PORT
configCODEXPRO_PUBLIC_HOSTNAME
configCODEXPRO_REQUIRE_BASH_SESSION
🔐 secretCODEXPRO_REQUIRE_HTTP_TOKEN
configCODEXPRO_ROOT
configCODEXPRO_TOOL_CARDS
configCODEXPRO_TOOL_MODE
configCODEXPRO_TUNNEL
configCODEXPRO_TUNNEL_MODE
configCODEXPRO_WIDGET_DOMAIN
configCODEXPRO_WRITE_MODE
configHOST
configNGROK_DOMAIN
Deployment configuration, supplied by whoever hosts the server. Users are not asked for these.
deployPORT
// quality suggestions

Tests exist

No test files found

Add tests that exercise each declared tool.

No eval / new Function

1 eval() or new Function() call — dynamic code execution

Replace eval / Function with explicit parsing or safer alternatives.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 2 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Score](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/rebel0789/codexpro)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/rebel0789/codexpro)
Shows your grade and updates automatically. Prefer no grade? Append ?variant=verified to the badge URL.
commit: d66a2503621fca5b6dd732786a26be855f2c979c
code hash: 0578a4976534c664e59ec8bcf9011bb4fb848a7065c5c0934dbfb09d7979aad7
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client