random-agent (randomchips/random_agent) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 74 out of 100, grade C. It declares 8 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

C
Emerging
74/100

random-agent

Enables multi-worker autonomous agent orchestration: decompose complex tasks, run parallel workers, auto-review, and generate follow-up tasks via the Model Context Protocol.

Emerging. No concerning findings. Grades remain capped until the project builds reputation through adoption. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

randomchips

Source: Glama

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

Install from

The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.

// key findings
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configAGENT_OS_BASE_PATH"": "C:\\agent-os"
configAGENT_OS_COORDINATOR_SCRIPT
configAGENT_OS_LOOP_INTERVAL5 Coordinator loop interval (seconds)
configAGENT_OS_MAX_WORKERS5 Max concurrent worker processes
configAGENT_OS_OPENCODE_EXE
configAGENT_OS_STALL_THRESHOLD90 Seconds before worker is considered stuck
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

8/8 tools missing one or more hints — assert (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); handle_stuck (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); inject (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +5 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Tool inputs are validated

7/8 tool handlers declare input schemas (88%)

Declare an inputSchema with zod/joi/yup on every tool definition.

Tool handlers catch errors

5/8 tool handlers wrap calls in try/catch (63%)

Wrap each tool handler body in try/catch and return a structured error response.

License file

No license file

Add a LICENSE file (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.).

Tests exist

No test files found

Add tests that exercise each declared tool.

Tool description accuracy

orchestrate: description implies read-only but handler writes/deletes/executes

Update tool descriptions to accurately reflect all capabilities — especially write, delete, or execute operations.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 7 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Score](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/randomchips/random_agent)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/randomchips/random_agent)
Shows your grade and updates automatically. Prefer no grade? Append ?variant=verified to the badge URL.
commit: 2133c69c04f78fef782f1d7e884ac71b4856bede
code hash: c79d5cd3db502d92d8eb3aa3894045e39f99acf84b86966b5327da78fdaa11e4
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client