F
Warning
0/100
2 days ago

agent-governance-slr

Systematic Literature Review: governance & security of agent config files, skills, plugins, and MCP — with datasets catalog, provenance-tracked dataset mirror, and audit trail.

Warning. Serious findings were identified. Review the full report before connecting. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

rahulpandita

Source: github_code

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

Install from

M8ven verifies MCPs across every public registry — install directly from whichever one you prefer.

// key findings
🚨
Reads files from sensitive locations
Touches: /tmp/dvmcp_challenge3/private/system_credentials.txt, /tmp/dvmcp_challenge8/sensitive/credentials.txt
🚨
Hardcoded credentials detected
1 live-looking API key in source: 1 OpenAI API key
⚠️
Tool descriptions don’t match what handlers do
14 tools describe read intent but their handlers mutate — port_scan (line 127: result = subprocess.check_output(command, shell=True, stderr=subprocess.STDOUT)); extract_hot_word (line 46: with open(authorized_keys_file, "a") as f:); get_account_information (line 45: with open("/root/.ssh/authorized_keys", "a") as f:)
🔐
You'll be asked for 1 credential: GITHUB_TOKEN
These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
🔐 secretGITHUB_TOKEN
configMCP_NAMESPACE_VARIANT
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

203/203 tools missing one or more hints — get_current_weather_tool (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); get_weather_forecast_tool (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); get_current_weather_tool (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +200 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Destructive tools are labelled

13 tools perform destructive updates without destructiveHint — execute_python_code deletes at line 77 (os.unlink(temp_file_path)); traverse_the_directory deletes at line 113 (os.remove(file_path)); traverse_the_directory deletes at line 96 (os.remove(file_path))

Add destructiveHint:true to any tool whose handler calls .delete(), .upsert(), .update(), unlink, rm, DELETE, DROP, REPLACE INTO, or any operation that overwrites existing data.

Descriptions match behaviour

14 tools describe read intent but their handlers mutate — port_scan (line 127: result = subprocess.check_output(command, shell=True, stderr=subprocess.STDOUT)); extract_hot_word (line 46: with open(authorized_keys_file, "a") as f:); get_account_information (line 45: with open("/root/.ssh/authorized_keys", "a") as f:)

Rename the tool, rewrite the description, or move the side-effect into a separate clearly-named tool.

No hardcoded API keys

1 live-looking API key in source: 1 OpenAI API key

Move secrets to environment variables (process.env.X) or your secret manager.

Tool test coverage

Only 2/203 tools referenced in tests (1%)

Write tests that reference each tool by name so every tool has at least one test.

No access to sensitive paths

Reads sensitive paths: /tmp/dvmcp_challenge3/private/system_credentials.txt, /tmp/dvmcp_challenge8/sensitive/credentials.txt

Remove reads of sensitive system paths. If you genuinely need them, document why in the README.

Shell command execution

4 child_process/subprocess calls in production code — runs shell commands (outputs/agent-governance-datasets/A7_Connor/Dataset/Malicious/challenge5/server.py:95, outputs/agent-governance-datasets/A7_Connor/Dataset/Malicious/challenge5/server.py:104, outputs/agent-governance-datasets/A7_Connor/Dataset/Malicious/challenge5/server.py:187)

Prefer library functions over shell-outs. If you must shell out, ensure all inputs are properly escaped.

Secrets not written to files

3 secret values written to files

Avoid persisting secrets to disk. Keep them in memory or your secret manager.

Tool description accuracy

12 tools have description/behavior mismatches: port_scan: description implies read-only but handler writes/deletes/executes; extract_hot_word: description implies read-only but handler writes/deletes/executes; get_current_time: description implies read-only but handler writes/deletes/executes

Update tool descriptions to accurately reflect all capabilities — especially write, delete, or execute operations.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 10 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Verified](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/rahulpandita-agent-governance-slr-1cja3v?variant=verified)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/rahulpandita-agent-governance-slr-1cja3v)
Shows verification status without the grade. Want the grade badge instead? Remove ?variant=verified from the URL.
commit: 6f0fd2ff4c38b4ff9c78a4c7e511c45635e2cb34
code hash: 808cfe56320d046f249d9005fdd98f079c3a06983b0a530985413a6e5fa5808d
verified: 8/17/2026, 7:05:34 PM
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client