PTT MCP Server (PyPtt/ptt_mcp_server) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 71 out of 100, grade C. It declares 29 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

C
Limited view
71/100

PTT MCP Server

Enables AI clients to log in and interact with the PTT bulletin board system via MCP protocol, supporting article management, mailbox, and P-coin operations.

Limited view. Automated analysis covers part of this stack. Findings reflect what we verified. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

Limited view: static analysis for Python is partially covered.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

PyPtt

Source: Glama

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

Install from

The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.

// key findings
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
Open source with a license and README
Anyone can audit the code, the license is declared, and the publisher documents what it does.
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configPTT_ID"": "YOUR_PTT_ID", // 請換成您自己的 PTT 帳號
configPTT_PW"": "YOUR_PTT_PW" // 請換成您自己的 PTT 密碼
configPTT_ACCOUNTS若您有多組 PTT 帳號,可改用環境變數 (格式:名稱=帳號:密碼,多組以逗號分隔)一次設定多組,之後即可用 switch_account("名稱") 切換帳號、list_accounts() 查詢可用名稱:
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

29/29 tools missing one or more hints — get_board_rules (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); get_post_index_range (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); get_version (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +26 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Tool inputs are validated

20/29 tool handlers declare input schemas (69%)

Declare an inputSchema with zod/joi/yup on every tool definition.

Tool handlers catch errors

Only 4/29 tool handlers wrap calls in try/catch (14%)

Wrap each tool handler body in try/catch and return a structured error response.

Tests exist

No test files found

Add tests that exercise each declared tool.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 5 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Score](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/pyptt/ptt_mcp_server)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/pyptt/ptt_mcp_server)
Shows your grade and updates automatically. Prefer no grade? Append ?variant=verified to the badge URL.
commit: b29f003687c458fd0db42c0f6e924d7a26ed387d
code hash: 44f33856ab0d7e91d71ae4d8c783a33537427958cf489547fa98b49b9901a53b
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client