F
Warning
2/100
7 days ago

pwiz-ai

AI tooling and documentation for ProteoWizard/Skyline development

Warning. Serious findings were identified. Review the full report before connecting. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

ProteoWizard

Source: github_code

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

Install from

M8ven verifies MCPs across every public registry — install directly from whichever one you prefer.

// key findings
🚨
Code appears obfuscated
1 file are unreadable to a human reviewer. Cannot audit what they do.
⚠️
Tool descriptions don’t match what handlers do
2 tools describe read intent but their handlers mutate — fetch_labkey_page (line 813: filepath.write_text(html_content, encoding='utf-8')); mailchimp_get_campaign (line 203: html_file.write_text(html, encoding="utf-8"))
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configLABKEY_SERVER
configOSPREY_RUNS_DIR
configOSPREY_PASS1_QCUT
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

68/68 tools missing one or more hints — get_project_status (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); get_status (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); get_last_screenshot (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +65 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Descriptions match behaviour

2 tools describe read intent but their handlers mutate — fetch_labkey_page (line 813: filepath.write_text(html_content, encoding='utf-8')); mailchimp_get_campaign (line 203: html_file.write_text(html, encoding="utf-8"))

Rename the tool, rewrite the description, or move the side-effect into a separate clearly-named tool.

License file

No license file

Add a LICENSE file (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.).

Tool test coverage

Only 0/68 tools referenced in tests (0%)

Write tests that reference each tool by name so every tool has at least one test.

No eval / new Function

1 eval() or new Function() call — dynamic code execution

Replace eval / Function with explicit parsing or safer alternatives.

Readable source code

1 file appear obfuscated

Ship unminified, readable source.

Tool description accuracy

fetch_labkey_page: description implies read-only but handler writes/deletes/executes; mailchimp_get_campaign: description implies read-only but handler writes/deletes/executes

Update tool descriptions to accurately reflect all capabilities — especially write, delete, or execute operations.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 8 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Verified](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/proteowizard-pwiz-ai-1q2zcj?variant=verified)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/proteowizard-pwiz-ai-1q2zcj)
Shows verification status without the grade. Want the grade badge instead? Remove ?variant=verified from the URL.
commit: 540d0c8183e4ad2bf54f52b4ea059e3e0bf0efc3
code hash: 9cec4db9321f6a7e6cdbc52ac0bcf246f487c1d65725a851ef3bd104b1c09412
verified: 8/13/2026, 7:49:13 AM
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client