Reporecall (proofofwork-agency/reporecall) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 74 out of 100, grade C. It declares 30 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

Back to MCP Trust IndexM8ven
—
Source no longer public
3 months ago

Reporecall

Zero-tool-call codebase intelligence for Claude Code and MCP clients. Automatically injects the right code context, functions, callers, and call chains, before the LLM starts thinking. Replaces 4-6 grep/read round-trips with a single 5ms hook injection, cutting token usage by 3-8x.

→ proofofwork-agency/reporecall· listed on glama

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

proofofwork-agency

Source: Glama · also listed on github_topic

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

⚡ Connect GitHub for Live Monitored

Install from

GlamaGitHub

M8ven verifies MCPs across every public registry — install directly from whichever one you prefer.

// key findings
✅
30 tools verified — handlers match their declared behaviour
22 read-only tools verified — handlers contain no write/delete/exec
✅
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
✅
Open source with a license and README
Anyone can audit the code, the license is declared, and the publisher documents what it does.
🔐
You'll be asked for 1 credential: OPENAI_API_KEY
These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configMEMORY_LOG_DEST
configMEMORY_LOG_LEVEL
🔐 secretOPENAI_API_KEY
configREPORECALL_BENCH_JUDGE
configREPORECALL_BENCH_MAX_BUDGET_USD
configREPORECALL_BENCH_MODEL
configREPORECALL_RUN_LIVE_MEMORY_BENCH
// quality suggestions

All four hints declared on every tool

30/30 tools missing one or more hints — search_code (missing: destructiveHint, openWorldHint); index_codebase (missing: readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); refresh_context (missing: readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +27 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Tool inputs are validated

29/30 tool handlers declare input schemas (97%)

Declare an inputSchema with zod/joi/yup on every tool definition.

Tool test coverage

16/30 tools referenced in tests (53%)

Write tests that reference each tool by name so every tool has at least one test.

Shell command execution

43 child_process calls — runs shell commands

Prefer library functions over shell-outs. If you must shell out, ensure all inputs are properly escaped.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 4 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Score](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/proofofwork-agency/reporecall)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/proofofwork-agency/reporecall)
Shows your grade and updates automatically. Prefer no grade? Append ?variant=verified to the badge URL.
commit: c27b2ddc7af5ca13670abfb51d018ccfaaad6fab
code hash: bd38eeb580aa1214c42b7de6cf9820e66248fa66dd5b0a0a8cf9903234a1a415
verified: 6/11/2026, 11:26:00 AM
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client