Back to MCP Trust Indexm8ven
C
Caution
74/100
11 days ago

mcp-bridge

→ Pranavk098/mcp-bridge· listed on github_code

Caution. Specific findings reduced this grade. They are listed on the page. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

Pranavk098

Source: github_code

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

⚡ Connect GitHub for Live Monitored

Install from

GitHub

M8ven verifies MCPs across every public registry — install directly from whichever one you prefer.

// key findings
⚠️
Tests do not pass
Either the test suite is broken or the code regressed. Either way the published behaviour can’t be verified by the publisher’s own tests.
✅
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
🔐
You'll be asked for 3 credentials: OPENAI_API_KEY, COGNITO_CLIENT_SECRET, ANTHROPIC_API_KEY
These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configDYNAMODB_AUDIT_TABLE
🔐 secretOPENAI_API_KEY"": "sk-..."
configMCP_BRIDGE_URL
configCOGNITO_TOKEN_URL
configCOGNITO_CLIENT_IDclient-id> \
🔐 secretCOGNITO_CLIENT_SECRET
🔐 secretANTHROPIC_API_KEYsk-ant-... \
Deployment configuration, supplied by whoever hosts the server. Users are not asked for these.
deployDATABASE_URL
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

5/5 tools missing one or more hints — calculate (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); read_file (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); rest_call (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +2 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Tool inputs are validated

Only 0/5 tool handlers declare input schemas (0%)

Declare an inputSchema with zod/joi/yup on every tool definition.

License file

No license file

Add a LICENSE file (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.).

Tool test coverage

Only 1/5 tools referenced in tests (20%)

Write tests that reference each tool by name so every tool has at least one test.

Tests pass

npm test failed — tests do not pass

Make sure npm test runs cleanly. Common cause: missing build step or missing env vars.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 6 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Verified](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/pranavk098-mcp-bridge-nv6o8j?variant=verified)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/pranavk098-mcp-bridge-nv6o8j)
Shows verification status without the grade. Want the grade badge instead? Remove ?variant=verified from the URL.
commit: 98a05906909fac7541a41e57e134c634795ef521
code hash: cc7dd4e265f469bf34b2c50930ef6ebf042c5109743e13336dc5bed4d20769be
verified: 8/8/2026, 7:26:00 AM
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client