Networking MCP (otnielba/networking-mcp) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 74 out of 100, grade C. It declares 10 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

Back to MCP Trust Indexm8ven
C
Emerging
74/100
1 month ago

Networking MCP

Local-first MCP server for research on AI-assisted browsing of a user-owned professional-network account (e.g., LinkedIn), providing read-focused tools such as profile, company, search, and feed reads.

→ otnielba/networking-mcp· listed on glama

Emerging. No concerning findings. Grades remain capped until the project builds reputation through adoption. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

otnielba

Source: Glama

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

⚡ Connect GitHub for Live Monitored

Install from

Glama

M8ven verifies MCPs across every public registry — install directly from whichever one you prefer.

// key findings
✅
10 tools verified — handlers match their declared behaviour
7 read-only tools verified — handlers contain no write/delete/exec
✅
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
✅
Open source with a license and README
Anyone can audit the code, the license is declared, and the publisher documents what it does.
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configELECTRON_RENDERER_URL
configLINKEDIN_MCP_LOG_LEVEL
configLMCP_DATASET_DIR
// quality suggestions

Dependencies

14 dependencies, 1 flagged: playwright-core

All four hints declared on every tool

9/10 tools missing one or more hints — get_company (missing: destructiveHint, idempotentHint); get_feed (missing: destructiveHint, idempotentHint); get_mutual_connections (missing: destructiveHint, idempotentHint), +6 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Tool inputs are validated

8/9 tool handlers declare input schemas (89%)

Declare an inputSchema with zod/joi/yup on every tool definition.

Tool handlers catch errors

Only 3/9 tool handlers wrap calls in try/catch (33%)

Wrap each tool handler body in try/catch and return a structured error response.

Tool test coverage

Only 2/10 tools referenced in tests (20%)

Write tests that reference each tool by name so every tool has at least one test.

Shell command execution

1 child_process call — runs shell commands

Prefer library functions over shell-outs. If you must shell out, ensure all inputs are properly escaped.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 5 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Score](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/otnielba-networking-mcp-n96s0a)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/otnielba-networking-mcp-n96s0a)
Shows your grade and updates automatically. Prefer no grade? Append ?variant=verified to the badge URL.
commit: 32341a4723f3dfe7d327c220ec8054e619f732b6
code hash: 3dec627ac6cacf9ff9f0c8b17d4e6d18af91f66a42cae27333c146efc68f6bc8
verified: 6/28/2026, 9:07:55 AM
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client