openresearch-mcp (olanokhin/openresearch-mcp) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. M8ven has not graded it: there is no public source to read and no endpoint we can reach, so there is nothing for us to inspect. No publisher has claimed this listing.

C
Emerging
74/100
16 days ago

openresearch-mcp

Zero-auth multi-source research MCP server that enables web search, reading URLs, PDFs, GitHub repos, and querying Hacker News, Stack Overflow, Semantic Scholar, and YouTube transcripts without API keys.

Emerging. No concerning findings. Grades remain capped until the project builds reputation through adoption. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

olanokhin

Source: Glama

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

Install from

M8ven verifies MCPs across every public registry — install directly from whichever one you prefer.

// key findings
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
Open source with a license and README
Anyone can audit the code, the license is declared, and the publisher documents what it does.
🔐
You'll be asked for 2 credentials: STACKEXCHANGE_KEY, GITHUB_TOKEN
These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configMCP_TRANSPORT
configMCP_HOST
configMCP_PORT
🔐 secretSTACKEXCHANGE_KEYsearch_stackoverflow Stack Overflow API Set for higher quota 212
configOPENALEX_EMAILsearch_openalex OpenAlex 250M+ works, zero rate limiting; set for polite pool 231
🔐 secretGITHUB_TOKENread_repo GitHub public repos README + file tree + key docs; set for 5k req/hr 211
configSEC_USER_AGENTget_company_financials SEC EDGAR Annual revenue, earnings, assets for a US-listed company by ticker (10-K filings); no key (set for heavy use) 233
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

22/22 tools missing one or more hints — web_search (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); read_url (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); read_pdf (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +19 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 2 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Score](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/olanokhin-openresearch-mcp-1u50ek)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/olanokhin-openresearch-mcp-1u50ek)
Shows your grade and updates automatically. Prefer no grade? Append ?variant=verified to the badge URL.
commit: 5205707df41fcaa6d21180415a27808c05cba377
code hash: 439072edb351026830888fd018a422bad998613531594f51b1d30620e5c767f5
verified: 8/11/2026, 1:44:41 PM
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client