agents-md-generator (nushey/agents-md-generator) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 26 out of 100, grade F. It declares 3 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

F
Warning
26/100

agents-md-generator

MCP server that analyzes codebases with tree-sitter and generates AGENTS.md files for AI agents.

Warning. Serious findings were identified. Review the full report before connecting. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

nushey

Source: Glama

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

Install from

The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.

// key findings
⚠️
Tool annotations don’t match behaviour
1 read-only tool performs write/delete/exec — read_payload_chunk (line 293: payload_path.unlink())
⚠️
Tool descriptions don’t match what handlers do
1 tool describes read intent but its handler mutates — read_payload_chunk (line 293: payload_path.unlink())
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
Open source with a license and README
Anyone can audit the code, the license is declared, and the publisher documents what it does.
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configAGENTS_MD_LOG_LEVELINFO Server log verbosity. Set to DEBUG to see per-file analysis details. Valid values: DEBUG, INFO, WARNING, ERROR
Deployment configuration, supplied by whoever hosts the server. Users are not asked for these.
deployPORT
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations match behaviour

1 read-only tool performs write/delete/exec — read_payload_chunk (line 293: payload_path.unlink())

Either remove the readOnlyHint:true annotation, or remove the write/delete call from the tool handler.

Destructive tools are labelled

1 tool perform destructive updates without destructiveHint — read_payload_chunk deletes at line 293 (payload_path.unlink())

Add destructiveHint:true to any tool whose handler calls .delete(), .upsert(), .update(), unlink, rm, DELETE, DROP, REPLACE INTO, or any operation that overwrites existing data.

Descriptions match behaviour

1 tool describes read intent but its handler mutates — read_payload_chunk (line 293: payload_path.unlink())

Rename the tool, rewrite the description, or move the side-effect into a separate clearly-named tool.

Tests exist

No test files found

Add tests that exercise each declared tool.

Tool description accuracy

read_payload_chunk: description implies read-only but handler writes/deletes/executes

Update tool descriptions to accurately reflect all capabilities — especially write, delete, or execute operations.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 5 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Verified](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/nushey/agents-md-generator?variant=verified)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/nushey/agents-md-generator)
Shows verification status without the grade. Want the grade badge instead? Remove ?variant=verified from the URL.
commit: c40f27c1ed9aa547c98c61af795681df622b6e94
code hash: ed90934e30ec219b68f8d7ecc415245e736ece69f8f14ef7da235db687560fff
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client