no_human (no-human-ai/no_human) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 89 out of 100, grade B. It declares 2 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

Back to MCP Trust IndexM8ven
B
Emerging
89/100
10 days ago

no_human

From ticket to reviewed pull request. Free and open-source, on your machine.

→ no-human-ai/no_human· listed on glama

Emerging. No concerning findings. Grades remain capped until the project builds reputation through adoption. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

no-human-ai

Source: Glama · also listed on github_code

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

⚡ Connect GitHub for Live Monitored

Install from

Glamanot scored hereGitHub

The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.

// key findings
✅
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
✅
Open source with a license and README
Anyone can audit the code, the license is declared, and the publisher documents what it does.
🔐
You'll be asked for 1 credential: ANTHROPIC_API_KEY
These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configNH_BIN
configNH_FAKE_GRANT_RC
configNH_FAKE_LOG
configNH_FAKE_READ_BODY
configNH_FAKE_READ_RC
configNH_ICON_MASTER
configNH_LATE_POLL_MS
configNH_ORIGIN
configNH_SPAWN_TIMEOUT_MS
configNH_TEST_LOG
configSHELL
configPYTEST_XDIST_AUTO_NUM_WORKERS
🔐 secretANTHROPIC_API_KEY
configNO_HUMAN_HOME
configPARCELO_ZONE_C_SURCHARGE
configNO_HUMAN_HOME_OVERRIDE
configEDITOR
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

2/2 tools missing one or more hints — task_add (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); task_status (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint). OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

No eval / new Function

1 eval() or new Function() call — dynamic code execution

Replace eval / Function with explicit parsing or safer alternatives.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 3 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Score](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/no-human-ai/no_human)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/no-human-ai/no_human)
Shows your grade and updates automatically. Prefer no grade? Append ?variant=verified to the badge URL.
commit: 1b277c0d566e74b0f7b2581b8f4ec8b52373bcf4
code hash: e3a203fc3b4b2f08945b27b079a612eadfaf87ab719bf71b1e44b84f298211e4
verified: 9/1/2026, 11:27:52 PM
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client