nitrostack (nitrocloudofficial/nitrostack) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 68 out of 100, grade C. It declares 676 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

C
Caution
68/100

nitrostack

The full-stack TypeScript framework to build, test, and deploy production-ready MCP servers and AI-native apps.

Caution. Specific findings reduced this grade. They are listed on the page. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

nitrocloudofficial

Source: npm · also listed on github_topic

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

Install from

The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.

// key findings
🚨
Secret credentials may flow to a network call
3 flows detected: GITHUB_TOKEN, POSTHOG_KEY. We can’t prove the destination matches the brand the credential belongs to.
⚠️
Tool descriptions don’t match what handlers do
1 tool describes read intent but its handler mutates — run_gui_simulation (line 370: subprocess.Popen(cmd))
🔐
You'll be asked for 10 credentials: AZURE_SPEECH_KEY, GEMINI_API_KEY, GITHUB_TOKEN, GOOGLE_CLIENT_SECRET, GOOGLE_MAPS_API_KEY, JWT_SECRET, TWILIO_AUTH_TOKEN, POSTHOG_KEY, GROQ_API_KEY, OPENAI_API_KEY
These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configAUTH_SERVER_URL
🔐 secretAZURE_SPEECH_KEY
configAZURE_SPEECH_REGION
configENABLE_CORS
🔐 secretGEMINI_API_KEY
configGITHUB_REPO_NAME
configGITHUB_REPO_OWNER
🔐 secretGITHUB_TOKEN
configGOOGLE_CLIENT_ID
🔐 secretGOOGLE_CLIENT_SECRET
🔐 secretGOOGLE_MAPS_API_KEY
configGOOGLE_REDIRECT_URI
configHOST
🔐 secretJWT_SECRET
configMCP_MAX_SESSIONS
configMCP_SERVER_HOST
configMCP_SESSION_TIMEOUT_MS
configMCP_TRANSPORT_TYPE
configOAUTH_REQUIRED
configPYTHONUTF8
configRESOURCE_URI
configSLACK_WEBHOOK_URL
configTOKEN_AUDIENCE
🔐 secretTWILIO_AUTH_TOKEN
configTWILIO_SID
configTWILIO_WHATSAPP_NUMBER
configWEBHOOK_PORT
configWIDGETS_DEV_MODE
configWIDGETS_DEV_PORT
🔐 secretPOSTHOG_KEY
configPOSTHOG_HOST
configPYTHON_PATH
configSUMO_HOME
configHEADLESS_MODE
configNITRO_CLOUD
🔐 secretGROQ_API_KEY
configRELOAD
configLOG_LEVEL
configHTTP_TIMEOUT_SECONDS
configCACHE_TTL_SECONDS
🔐 secretOPENAI_API_KEY
configOPENAI_BASE_URL
configOPENAI_MODEL
configOLLAMA_HOST
configOLLAMA_MODEL
configLLM_PROVIDER
configMAX_TOKENS
configTIMEOUT
Deployment configuration, supplied by whoever hosts the server. Users are not asked for these.
deployPORT
deploySUPABASE_ANON_KEY
deploySUPABASE_SERVICE_ROLE_KEY
deploySUPABASE_URL
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

76/676 tools have annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

631/676 tools missing one or more hints — scan_cloud_inventory (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); audit_security_risks (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); calculate_idle_waste (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +628 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Destructive tools are labelled

1 tool perform destructive updates without destructiveHint — generate_network deletes at line 177 (os.remove(f))

Add destructiveHint:true to any tool whose handler calls .delete(), .upsert(), .update(), unlink, rm, DELETE, DROP, REPLACE INTO, or any operation that overwrites existing data.

Descriptions match behaviour

1 tool describes read intent but its handler mutates — run_gui_simulation (line 370: subprocess.Popen(cmd))

Rename the tool, rewrite the description, or move the side-effect into a separate clearly-named tool.

Tool test coverage

Only 71/676 tools referenced in tests (11%)

Write tests that reference each tool by name so every tool has at least one test.

Shell command execution

2 calls in production code run through a shell (typescript/packages/core/src/ui-next/index.ts:107, typescript/packages/core/src/ui-next/index.ts:209)

Prefer library functions over shell-outs. If you must shell out, ensure all inputs are properly escaped.

Tool description accuracy

run_gui_simulation: description implies read-only but handler writes/deletes/executes

Update tool descriptions to accurately reflect all capabilities — especially write, delete, or execute operations.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 7 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Verified](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/nitrocloudofficial/nitrostack?variant=verified)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/nitrocloudofficial/nitrostack)
Shows verification status without the grade. Want the grade badge instead? Remove ?variant=verified from the URL.
commit: 1e3dc9bb1792a354f05aec11a1eb04af75c50728
code hash: da68a4c45d1b084b0d0fc2e86005f0a55caf5e1c872c15416cdcef8e4fb94e41
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client