German Law MCP Server (nenna-ai-GmbH/German-law-mcp) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. M8ven has not graded it: we have no way to read this server ourselves. No publisher has claimed this listing.

Back to MCP Trust Indexm8ven
C
Emerging
74/100
25 days ago

German Law MCP Server

Enables querying 6,870 German federal statutes, case law, and legislative preparatory works directly from AI assistants and MCP-compatible clients.

→ nenna-ai-GmbH/German-law-mcp· listed on glama

Emerging. No concerning findings. Grades remain capped until the project builds reputation through adoption. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

nenna-ai-GmbH

Source: Glama

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

⚡ Connect GitHub for Live Monitored

Install from

Glama

M8ven verifies MCPs across every public registry — install directly from whichever one you prefer.

// key findings
✅
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
✅
Open source with a license and README
Anyone can audit the code, the license is declared, and the publisher documents what it does.
🔐
You'll be asked for 1 credential: GERMAN_LAW_DIP_API_KEY
These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configDB_RELEASE_TAG
configGERMAN_LAW_DB_PATH
🔐 secretGERMAN_LAW_DIP_API_KEY
configGERMAN_LAW_INGEST_CASES_STOP_AFTER_EXISTING
configGERMAN_LAW_INGEST_MAX_CASES
configGERMAN_LAW_INGEST_MAX_LAWS
configGERMAN_LAW_INGEST_MAX_PREP_WORKS
configGERMAN_LAW_INGEST_PREP_STOP_AFTER_EXISTING
configGERMAN_LAW_PREP_WAHLPERIODEN
configLAW_COUNTRIES
configPREMIUM_ENABLED
configGERMAN_LAW_AUTO_UPDATE_CASES_MAX
configGERMAN_LAW_AUTO_UPDATE_CASES_STOP_AFTER_EXISTING
configGERMAN_LAW_AUTO_UPDATE_PREP_MAX
configGERMAN_LAW_AUTO_UPDATE_PREP_STOP_AFTER_EXISTING
Deployment configuration, supplied by whoever hosts the server. Users are not asked for these.
deployPORT
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

19/19 tools missing one or more hints — search_legislation (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); search_case_law (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); get_preparatory_works (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +16 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Domain consistency

npm scope @ansvar doesn't match GitHub owner nenna-ai-gmbh

Use the same org name across GitHub, npm, and your homepage so users can verify the publisher.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 3 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Score](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/nenna-ai-gmbh-german-law-mcp-c6eqrn)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/nenna-ai-gmbh-german-law-mcp-c6eqrn)
Shows your grade and updates automatically. Prefer no grade? Append ?variant=verified to the badge URL.
commit: c21807a211cf6bacec47c993dad8920f8a8d4172
code hash: a2b8ac9dd18e74844346cd1323a5f11f7580c7f146f3c589e6e29a979da8be21
verified: 8/6/2026, 5:33:33 AM
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client