SAST-GUI (naf01/SAST-GUI) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 74 out of 100, grade C. It declares 60 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

Back to MCP Trust IndexM8ven
C
Emerging
74/100

SAST-GUI

Single GUI Agent System Failure Taxonomy

→ naf01/SAST-GUI· listed on github_code

Emerging. No concerning findings. Grades remain capped until the project builds reputation through adoption. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

naf01

Source: github_code

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

⚡ Connect GitHub for Live Monitored

Install from

GitHub

The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.

// key findings
✅
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
✅
Open source with a license and README
Anyone can audit the code, the license is declared, and the publisher documents what it does.
🔐
You'll be asked for 5 credentials: OPENAI_API_KEY, ANTHROPIC_API_KEY, AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY, PERPLEXITY_API_KEY, TAVILY_API_KEY
These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configEVE_AGENT_LOGS_DIR
configEVE_HOST
configEVE_PORT
configEVE_STARTUP_TIMEOUT_MS
configOSWORLD_SERVER_HOST
configOSWORLD_SERVER_PORT
configCLAWBENCH_DATA_DIR
configCLAWBENCH_LIVE_DIR
configCLAWBENCH_BROWSER_CDP_URL_FILE
configCLAWBENCH_REMOTE_BROWSER_CDP_URL
configCLAWBENCH_RECORDING_MODE
configDISPLAY
configSINGULARITY_WORKDIR
configTAU3_RUNTIME_STATE_PATH
configTAU2_DATA_DIR
configTAU2_USER_TEMPERATURE
configTAU2_USER_REASONING_EFFORT
🔐 secretOPENAI_API_KEY
configOPENAI_BASE_URL
configTAU2_USER_MODEL
configTAU2_USER_LLM_ARGS_JSON
configNB_WORK_DIR
configNBCLI_PORT
configNBCLI_HOST
configDONE_STABILITY_PERIOD
configMONITOR_IN_DOCKER
configTASK_CONFIG_PATH
configEXAMPLES_BASE_PATH
configRESULTS_BASE_PATH
configTASK_CLASS_BASE_PATH
configMAX_STEPS
configACTION_SPACE
configOBSERVATION_TYPE
configMODEL_NAME
configFLASK_HOST
configFLASK_PORT
configFLASK_DEBUG
🔐 secretANTHROPIC_API_KEY
configAWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID
🔐 secretAWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY
configAWS_DEFAULT_REGION
configANTHROPIC_API_KEY_BACKUP
configHF_HUB_READ_TIMEOUT
configHF_HUB_CONNECT_TIMEOUT
configHF_HUB_ETAG_TIMEOUT
configHF_HUB_MAX_RETRIES
configREWARDKIT_JUDGE
configREWARDKIT_MODEL
configSCENARIO_PATH
configEVENT_LOG_PATH
configWIDTH
configHEIGHT
configDISPLAY_NUM
🔐 secretPERPLEXITY_API_KEY
🔐 secretTAVILY_API_KEY
Deployment configuration, supplied by whoever hosts the server. Users are not asked for these.
deployPORT
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

60/60 tools missing one or more hints — configure_run (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); get_runtime_status (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); get_assistant_tool_schemas (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +57 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Tool test coverage

20/60 tools referenced in tests (33%)

Write tests that reference each tool by name so every tool has at least one test.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 3 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Score](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/naf01/sast-gui)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/naf01/sast-gui)
Shows your grade and updates automatically. Prefer no grade? Append ?variant=verified to the badge URL.
commit: b185de6c4e8a951266757346a76386c359f69e5b
code hash: 6248eb0d8d31cf3417f319f2b3dc00cac17ed31e6d2e4b89f5cb82e59a0be89d
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client