better-code-review-graph (n24q02m/better-code-review-graph) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 73 out of 100, grade C. It declares 6 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

Back to MCP Trust IndexM8ven
C
Limited view
73/100

better-code-review-graph

Knowledge graph for token-efficient code reviews -- semantic search and call-graph resolution across your codebase.

→ n24q02m/better-code-review-graph· listed on glama

Limited view. Automated analysis covers part of this stack. Findings reflect what we verified. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

Limited view: static analysis for Python is partially covered.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

n24q02m

Source: Glama · also listed on github_topic, github_repo_search

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

⚡ Connect GitHub for Live Monitored

Install from

Glamanot scored hereGitHub

The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.

// key findings
✅
6 tools verified — handlers match their declared behaviour
3 read-only tools verified — handlers contain no write/delete/exec
✅
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
✅
Open source with a license and README
Anyone can audit the code, the license is declared, and the publisher documents what it does.
🔐
You'll be asked for 5 credentials: MCP_DCR_SERVER_SECRET, JINA_AI_API_KEY, GEMINI_API_KEY, GOOGLE_API_KEY, OPENAI_API_KEY
These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configPUBLIC_URLIn HTTP mode it returns <>/authorize so the agent can re-open the
🔐 secretMCP_DCR_SERVER_SECRET
configMCP_HOST
configMCP_PORT
configMCP_TRANSPORT"env": { "": "stdio" }
configTRANSPORT_MODE
configCRG_STALE_HOURS
configCRG_DATA_DIROverride the per-user data directory (default ~/.crg) used for per-user graphs and credentials in HTTP multi-user mode
🔐 secretJINA_AI_API_KEYjina_ai/ <https://jina.ai/api-key>
🔐 secretGEMINI_API_KEYgemini/ (or GOOGLE_API_KEY) <https://aistudio.google.com/apikey>
🔐 secretGOOGLE_API_KEYgemini/ GEMINI_API_KEY (or ) <https://aistudio.google.com/apikey>
🔐 secretOPENAI_API_KEYopenai/ (or bare text-embedding-) <https://platform.openai.com/api-keys>
configEMBEDDING_BACKEND/ EMBEDDING_MODEL / SUMMARY_MODEL Deprecated singular vars, honored one release with a warning -- migrate to the _MODELS chains
configMCP_RELAY_URL
// quality suggestions

Tool handlers catch errors

Only 1/6 tool handlers wrap calls in try/catch (17%)

Wrap each tool handler body in try/catch and return a structured error response.

Tests exist

No test files found

Add tests that exercise each declared tool.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 2 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Score](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/n24q02m/better-code-review-graph)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/n24q02m/better-code-review-graph)
Shows your grade and updates automatically. Prefer no grade? Append ?variant=verified to the badge URL.
commit: 5167bdec3c47471de8c5aca50d0468bf462bb798
code hash: 8aae3027b4e587017adfe1db6aefba7accd159a93e6d767efacc4567d9a8cb55
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client