code-grapher (mufasadb/code-grapher) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 71 out of 100, grade C. It declares 10 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

Limited view

71/100

code-grapher

Item: code-grapher
Rating: 71
Author: M8ven

Enables Claude to intelligently analyze and query codebases using knowledge graphs, supporting natural language code search, relationship discovery, and incremental updates.

→ mufasadb/code-grapher · listed on glama

Limited view. Automated analysis covers part of this stack. Findings reflect what we verified. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

Limited view: static analysis for Python is partially covered.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every push why connect →

Who stands behind it

mufasadb

Source: Glama

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

⚡ Connect GitHub for Live Monitored

Install from

Glamanot scored here

The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.

// key findings

✅

No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation

Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.

🔐

You'll be asked for 2 credentials: GEMINI_API_KEY, NEO4J_PASSWORD

These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.

// environment variables

To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.

configPIPELINE_MAX_RETRIES

configPIPELINE_TIMEOUT

configENABLE_AI_DESCRIPTIONS

configENABLE_RELATIONSHIP_EXTRACTION

configENABLE_EMBEDDINGS

configPIPELINE_BATCH_SIZE

configPIPELINE_PARALLEL

configEMBEDDING_MODEL

configCHROMA_PATH

configRAG_MAX_RESULTS

configRAG_CONTEXT_DEPTH

configRAG_HYBRID_SEARCH

configRAG_SEMANTIC_THRESHOLD

configSERVICE_TIMEOUT

configMAX_CONCURRENT_OPS

configENABLE_PERFORMANCE_MONITORING

configLOG_LEVEL

configLOG_TO_FILE

configLOG_DIRECTORY

configPRIMER_FILE_PATH/path/to/custom/primer.md

configAI_PROVIDERSet =gemini in .env

configOLLAMA_URL=http://localhost:11434

🔐 secretGEMINI_API_KEYAdd to your .env file: =your_api_key_here

configNEO4J_URL=bolt://localhost:7687

configNEO4J_USERNAME"": "neo4j",

🔐 secretNEO4J_PASSWORD=your_password

configNEO4J_MAX_CONNECTION_LIFETIME

configNEO4J_MAX_POOL_SIZE

configNEO4J_CONNECTION_TIMEOUT

// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

10/10 tools missing one or more hints — create_code_graph (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); update_graph_from_diff (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); query_code_graph (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +7 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

License file

No license file

Add a LICENSE file (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.).

Tests exist

No test files found

Add tests that exercise each declared tool.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail

The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.

// improvement guidance — verified publishers only

We have 4 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.

// embed badge in your README

[![M8ven Score](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/mufasadb/code-grapher)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/mufasadb/code-grapher)

Shows your grade and updates automatically. Prefer no grade? Append ?variant=verified to the badge URL.

commit: 95d840ffcf2b764c9c05888df0849c7cc65044e7

code hash: 53401b904c2045268d57942232b3fd566356946abc753ca6282b028dd5fe8dc7

view raw JSON →

Check MCPs from inside your assistant

Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check

check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern

How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client