Odoo Pulse (minhhq-a1/odoo-pulse) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 54 out of 100, grade D. It declares 84 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

D
Caution
54/100

Odoo Pulse

An AI business analyst for your Odoo ERP. Ask one question, get one answer — numbers, highlights, risks, and a verdict (on-track / at-risk / off-track) — over the Model Context Protocol. CRUD bridges to Odoo already exist; this is the analytics layer that sits on top.

Caution. Specific findings reduced this grade. They are listed on the page. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

minhhq-a1

Source: Glama

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

Install from

The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.

// key findings
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
Open source with a license and README
Anyone can audit the code, the license is declared, and the publisher documents what it does.
🔐
You'll be asked for 1 credential: ODOO_API_KEY
These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configODOO_URLenv =https://acme.odoo.com \
configODOO_DBenv =acme \
configODOO_USERNAMEenv =you@example.com \
🔐 secretODOO_API_KEYenv =your-api-key \
configODOO_READ_ONLYenv =true \
configODOO_MAX_RECORDS
configODOO_VERIFY_SSL
configODOO_WRITABLE_MODELS
configODOO_ALLOW_DELETE
configODOO_SCHEMA_CACHE_TTL
configODOO_SCHEMA_CACHE_MAX
configODOO_MAX_ATTACHMENT_BYTES
configODOO_TIMEOUT
configODOO_TOOL_GROUPSapps — opt in via . Full catalogue and configuration:
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

84/84 tools missing one or more hints — find_partner (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); list_opportunities (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); list_sale_orders (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +81 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Destructive tools are labelled

1 tool perform destructive updates without destructiveHint — delete_records deletes at line 90 (return safe(lambda: {"deleted": get_client().unlink(model, ids), "ids": ids}))

Add destructiveHint:true to any tool whose handler calls .delete(), .upsert(), .update(), unlink, rm, DELETE, DROP, REPLACE INTO, or any operation that overwrites existing data.

Tool inputs are validated

83/84 tool handlers declare input schemas (99%)

Declare an inputSchema with zod/joi/yup on every tool definition.

Tool handlers catch errors

Only 3/84 tool handlers wrap calls in try/catch (4%)

Wrap each tool handler body in try/catch and return a structured error response.

Tests exist

No test files found

Add tests that exercise each declared tool.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 6 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Verified](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/minhhq-a1/odoo-pulse?variant=verified)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/minhhq-a1/odoo-pulse)
Shows verification status without the grade. Want the grade badge instead? Remove ?variant=verified from the URL.
commit: 15f55d77d0629f9d864f70d765c0a849f0319fba
code hash: 86de0bc5c71e6f88306e1c70013ac68772557bb300769cc0f0d384891a8fe939
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client