distributed-agent-orchestrator (mh-naderi/distributed-agent-orchestrator) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 74 out of 100, grade C. It declares 5 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

Emerging

74/100

distributed-agent-orchestrator

Item: distributed-agent-orchestrator
Rating: 74
Author: M8ven

Distributed multi-agent system built on MCP and LangGraph, with agents deployed as independent services on Kubernetes and monitored via Prometheus/Grafana. Local-first, no cloud required.

→ mh-naderi/distributed-agent-orchestrator · listed on github_code

Emerging. No concerning findings. Grades remain capped until the project builds reputation through adoption. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every push why connect →

Who stands behind it

mh-naderi

Source: github_code

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

⚡ Connect GitHub for Live Monitored

Install from

GitHub

The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.

// key findings

✅

No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation

Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.

🔐

You'll be asked for 1 credential: ANTHROPIC_API_KEY

These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.

// environment variables

To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.

configMCP_PORT

configSEARCH_MAX_RESULTS

configSEARCH_MIN_INTERVAL

configSEARCH_MAX_ATTEMPTS

configSEARCH_RETRY_BACKOFF

configOLLAMA_HOST

configEMBEDDING_MODEL

configEVAL_JUDGE_MODEL

configRESEARCH_AGENT_URL

configRETRIEVAL_AGENT_URL

configCODE_ANALYSIS_AGENT_URL

configMCP_HTTP_TIMEOUT

configMCP_READ_TIMEOUT

configMCP_DISCOVERY_TTL

configMAX_CONCURRENT_RUNSwhere there is headroom.

configMAX_QUEUED_RUNS

configOLLAMA_MODEL

configOLLAMA_THINK

configOLLAMA_NUM_CTXThe interesting part is the budget. is 4096 tokens and one

configOLLAMA_NUM_GPU

configOLLAMA_KEEP_ALIVE

configHISTORY_BUDGET_FRACTION

configMAX_TASK_CHARSlonger than instead.

configMAX_SESSIONSSessions live in memory and are bounded by and SESSION_TTL;

configSESSION_TTLSessions live in memory and are bounded by MAX_SESSIONS and ;

configCLAUDE_MODELSet to change the model and CLAUDE_FALLBACKS=off to drop the

configCLAUDE_MAX_TOKENS

configCLAUDE_FALLBACKSSet CLAUDE_MODEL to change the model and =off to drop the

🔐 secretANTHROPIC_API_KEY

configORCHESTRATOR_METRICS_PORT

configRESEARCH_INDEX_TIMEOUT

configRESEARCH_AUTO_INDEX

configRETRIEVAL_DB_PATH

// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

5/5 tools missing one or more hints — analyze_code (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); evaluate_expression (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); search_web (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +2 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

License file

No license file

Add a LICENSE file (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.).

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail

The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.

// improvement guidance — verified publishers only

We have 3 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.

// embed badge in your README

[![M8ven Score](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/mh-naderi/distributed-agent-orchestrator)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/mh-naderi/distributed-agent-orchestrator)

Shows your grade and updates automatically. Prefer no grade? Append ?variant=verified to the badge URL.

commit: 7ae5619c13ef9748c6645a6cf9694a44f999b9a7

code hash: 72f7645ac35dc7bae2772ee8c65026ef1ec5d3b14f4fbae34db6568bd983e306

view raw JSON →

Check MCPs from inside your assistant

Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check

check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern

How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client