ReDesign (LunarWerxs/ReDesign) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 74 out of 100, grade C. It declares 9 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

Back to MCP Trust IndexM8ven
C
Emerging
74/100

ReDesign

Drop in a UI screenshot and RēDesign runs it past many AI models at once, then gives you a browsable wall of self-contained HTML redesigns to compare. Runs locally on Bun.

→ LunarWerxs/ReDesign· listed on github_repo_search

Emerging. No concerning findings. Grades remain capped until the project builds reputation through adoption. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

LunarWerxs

Source: github_repo_search

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

⚡ Connect GitHub for Live Monitored

Install from

GitHub

The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.

// key findings
✅
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
✅
Open source with a license and README
Anyone can audit the code, the license is declared, and the publisher documents what it does.
// known CVEs in dependencies7 low

Disclosed vulnerabilities in this server's declared npm dependencies (via OSV). Whether each is reachable depends on the installed versions.

lowhono@4.12.28GHSA-54fx-42gc-7vw4

Hono: Algorithmic Complexity DoS in Language Middleware

lowhono@4.12.28GHSA-79qm-7rj5-m7r9

Hono: Proxy Helper does not remove response headers listed in the `Connection` header

lowhono@4.12.28GHSA-8j4g-w8fx-2239

Hono: ReDoS in CORS middleware via Access-Control-Request-Headers

lowhono@4.12.28GHSA-crvj-82cr-hjcx

Hono: Query parser reads parameters after the URL fragment, causing cache-key and proxy interpretation differentials

lowhono@4.12.28GHSA-f23p-vx2j-j53r

Hono: `memo()` retains SSR output across requests, leading to cross-user data disclosure

Depend on this server? Get alerted when its CVEs change.Watch this server free →
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configBUN_ENV
configHOST
configMOCK
configMOCK_BAD_SUBSTR
configMOCK_FAIL_CLASS
configMOCK_FAIL_RATE
configProgramFiles
configProgramFiles(x86)
configREDESIGN_HOME
configREDESIGN_NO_OPEN
configREDESIGN_NO_PINGmachine. Set =1 to turn it off entirely.
configREDESIGN_RELAUNCH
configREDESIGN_URL
configUPLOAD_IMAGE_LIMIT_MB
configUPLOAD_LIMIT_MB
Deployment configuration, supplied by whoever hosts the server. Users are not asked for these.
deployPORT
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

9/9 tools missing one or more hints — snapshot (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); list_inputs (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); key_health (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +6 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Tool test coverage

4/9 tools referenced in tests (44%)

Write tests that reference each tool by name so every tool has at least one test.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 3 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Score](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/lunarwerxs/redesign)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/lunarwerxs/redesign)
Shows your grade and updates automatically. Prefer no grade? Append ?variant=verified to the badge URL.
commit: 493b0e85a8e9cb730771ffb79a33d6ffbab3b043
code hash: 1f37b9814569ad8feadf59746493ea578925bd61c7b82a56761cd4447b47b653
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client