D
Caution
54/100
14 days ago

Caution. Specific findings reduced this grade. They are listed on the page. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

lukaliou123

Source: github_code

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

Install from

M8ven verifies MCPs across every public registry — install directly from whichever one you prefer.

// key findings
⚠️
Known vulnerabilities in dependencies: 3 high
Affects packages this MCP installs at runtime. Upgrade or remove the affected dependency.
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
Open source with a license and README
Anyone can audit the code, the license is declared, and the publisher documents what it does.
// known CVEs in dependencies3 high1 medium5 low

Disclosed vulnerabilities in this server's declared npm dependencies (via OSV). Whether each is reachable depends on the installed versions.

high@modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.0.0GHSA-w48q-cv73-mx4w

Model Context Protocol (MCP) TypeScript SDK does not enable DNS rebinding protection by default

highnodemailer@6.10.1GHSA-p6gq-j5cr-w38f

Nodemailer: Message-level raw option bypasses disableFileAccess/disableUrlAccess, enabling arbitrary file read and full-response SSRF in the delivered message

highnodemailer@6.10.1GHSA-rcmh-qjqh-p98v

Nodemailer’s addressparser is vulnerable to DoS caused by recursive calls

mediumnodemailer@6.10.1GHSA-mm7p-fcc7-pg87

Nodemailer: Email to an unintended domain can occur due to Interpretation Conflict

lownodemailer@6.10.1GHSA-268h-hp4c-crq3

Nodemailer: CRLF injection in Nodemailer List-* header comments allows arbitrary message header injection

Depend on this server? Get alerted when its CVEs change.Watch this server free →
// quality suggestions

Tests exist

No test files found

Add tests that exercise each declared tool.

Production dependencies are patched

0 critical, 3 high severity in production deps — @modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.0.0 (high), nodemailer@6.10.1 (high)

Run npm audit fix, or upgrade the affected packages to a non-vulnerable version.

Dependency freshness

1/4 production deps stale: mailgun-nodemailer-transport@2023-07-28 (3y)

Domain consistency

npm scope @jhgaylor doesn't match GitHub owner lukaliou123

Use the same org name across GitHub, npm, and your homepage so users can verify the publisher.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 3 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Verified](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/lukaliou123-resume-server-github-io-qllwpm?variant=verified)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/lukaliou123-resume-server-github-io-qllwpm)
Shows verification status without the grade. Want the grade badge instead? Remove ?variant=verified from the URL.
commit: e2c02760360ed1801a23b1be3079988e2c434db6
code hash: f9d37e89771d671cd66ddb814242181a8ea24227f1ce5b271b752df5d78d8c8a
verified: 8/8/2026, 7:52:29 AM
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client