agentic-software-delivery (karthikdevadoss/agentic-software-delivery) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 74 out of 100, grade C. It declares 13 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

Back to MCP Trust IndexM8ven
C
Emerging
74/100

agentic-software-delivery

Production Java/Spring energy platform with AI-assisted software delivery, incident triage, deterministic verification, RAG/MCP and engineering evidence.

→ karthikdevadoss/agentic-software-delivery· listed on github_repo_search

Emerging. No concerning findings. Grades remain capped until the project builds reputation through adoption. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

karthikdevadoss

Source: github_repo_search

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

⚡ Connect GitHub for Live Monitored

Install from

GitHub

The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.

// key findings
🚨
Secret credentials may flow to a network call
1 flow detected: VOYAGE_API_KEY. We can’t prove the destination matches the brand the credential belongs to.
🔐
You'll be asked for 3 credentials: ANTHROPIC_API_KEY, DEMO_GIT_PUSH_TOKEN, VOYAGE_API_KEY
These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.
// tools this server exposes9 tools

These names and descriptions are the publisher's own, read from the source code. We print them as written. Our assessment is the findings above, not this list.

list_repository_files

List files under a repository-relative directory (default: repo root).

read_file

Read the text contents of one repository file by its repo-relative path.

search_code

Case-insensitive literal substring search across repository source files.

semantic_repository_search

Semantic search over an index of repository files/docs. Candidates only — confirm with read_file/search_code before relying on results.

search_project_context

Read-only semantic search over a small CURATED backend-context corpus (Customer app source/tests + architecture/incident docs — see agent/backend_rag_corpus.py). Returns structured JSON evidence (source_path, source_type, symbol, line range, similarity score, content) for backend-requirement plannin…

propose_source_change

Propose a source code change for human review. Presents the proposed diff to a human operator and pauses for their explicit approve/reject decision before this call returns. You cannot approve your own proposal — there is no tool or field that lets you supply an approval decision; only the human ope…

apply_approved_source_change

Apply a previously proposed change to disk. Only succeeds if a human operator already approved this exact proposal via propose_source_change, and only if the path/content are unchanged since that approval — there is no way to approve a proposal through this or any other tool.

run_controlled_compile

Run 'mvn compile' on the Customer Spring Boot app. No arbitrary commands are possible — this always runs exactly this one allowlisted operation.

run_controlled_tests

Run 'mvn test' on the Customer Spring Boot app. No arbitrary commands are possible — this always runs exactly this one allowlisted operation.

// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configPLAYWRIGHT_BASE_URL
configCLAUDE_MODELset (in .env or the shell environment):
🔐 secretANTHROPIC_API_KEYIf is missing from both .env and the environment,
🔐 secretDEMO_GIT_PUSH_TOKEN
configRAG_EMBEDDING_PROVIDER
🔐 secretVOYAGE_API_KEY
configDISPLAY_TIMEZONE
configEVENT_LEDGER_DATABASE_URL
configLLM_MODE
Deployment configuration, supplied by whoever hosts the server. Users are not asked for these.
deployPORT
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

13/13 tools missing one or more hints — list_repository_files (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); read_file (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); search_code (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +10 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

License file

No license file

Add a LICENSE file (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.).

Tool test coverage

9/13 tools referenced in tests (69%)

Write tests that reference each tool by name so every tool has at least one test.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 4 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Score](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/karthikdevadoss/agentic-software-delivery)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/karthikdevadoss/agentic-software-delivery)
Shows your grade and updates automatically. Prefer no grade? Append ?variant=verified to the badge URL.
commit: 1277f8d22cc874b689b5f4a58560f51ee2a3acc5
code hash: c23f302e49f9d50325cd3d3be19c0e8b167d289ed2b781e8a88343b7a86c9d8a
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client