sarfile_analyzer_ng (jschaef/sarfile_analyzer_ng) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 74 out of 100, grade C. It declares 17 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

C
Emerging
74/100
10 days ago

sarfile_analyzer_ng

Fork of https://github.com/jschaef/sar_file_analyzer. Replaced Pandas with Polars for most dataframes

Emerging. No concerning findings. Grades remain capped until the project builds reputation through adoption. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

jschaef

Source: github_code

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

Install from

The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.

// key findings
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
Open source with a license and README
Anyone can audit the code, the license is declared, and the publisher documents what it does.
🔐
You'll be asked for 5 credentials: SAR_API_PASSWORD, SAR_SSO_SECRET, SAR_SSO_DEFAULT_PASSWORD, SAR_API_SECRET, REDIS_PASSWORD
These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configSAR_API_URL
configSAR_MCP_OUTPUT_DIR
configSAR_MCP_MAX_INLINE_IMAGE
configSAR_MCP_TLS_RELAX_STRICT
configSSL_CERT_FILE
configSAR_MCP_HOST
configSAR_MCP_PORT
configSAR_API_USERNAME
🔐 secretSAR_API_PASSWORD
configSAR_MCP_TRANSPORT
🔐 secretSAR_SSO_SECRET
🔐 secretSAR_SSO_DEFAULT_PASSWORD
configSAR_API_TOKEN_TTL
configSAR_SSO_UI_TTL
🔐 secretSAR_API_SECRET
configUPLOAD_DIR
configREDIS_ENABLED
configREDIS_HOST
configREDIS_PORT
configREDIS_USER
🔐 secretREDIS_PASSWORD
configRKEY_PREF
configPDF_NAME
configADMIN_EMAIL
configMAX_METRIC_HEADER
configCOLS_PER_LINE
configMAX_HEADER_COUNT
configFILE_TYPE
configADMIN_COMMUNICATION
configUSE_STREAMLIT_BOKEH_COMPONENT
configSAR_MAX_DECOMPRESSED_BYTES
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

17/17 tools missing one or more hints — login (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); logout (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); whoami (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +14 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Tests exist

No test files found

Add tests that exercise each declared tool.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 3 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Score](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/jschaef/sarfile_analyzer_ng)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/jschaef/sarfile_analyzer_ng)
Shows your grade and updates automatically. Prefer no grade? Append ?variant=verified to the badge URL.
commit: 1e8cdcb12c5a1cc979f740c2f0017b94ad43ed48
code hash: 6a9987749867f4e8436aebdc5904e3125d81e4c035d7fd6f460bc96fb0ad227c
verified: 9/2/2026, 6:49:20 PM
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client