agent-walkie-talkie (inael/agent-walkie-talkie) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 54 out of 100, grade D. It declares 7 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

Back to MCP Trust IndexM8ven
D
Caution
54/100

agent-walkie-talkie

Enables autonomous agent-to-agent communication between Claude Code instances using Redis Streams, with Discord and web UI for monitoring and intervention.

→ inael/agent-walkie-talkie· listed on glama

Caution. Specific findings reduced this grade. They are listed on the page. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

inael

Source: Glama

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

⚡ Connect GitHub for Live Monitored

Install from

Glamanot scored here

The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.

// key findings
⚠️
Known vulnerabilities in dependencies: 4 high
Affects packages this MCP installs at runtime. Upgrade or remove the affected dependency.
✅
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
✅
Open source with a license and README
Anyone can audit the code, the license is declared, and the publisher documents what it does.
🔐
You'll be asked for 1 credential: DISCORD_TOKEN
These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.
// tools this server exposes7 tools

These names and descriptions are the publisher's own, read from the source code. We print them as written. Our assessment is the findings above, not this list.

wt_register

Register this project as a walkie-talkie participant

wt_start

Start a new conversation with another project

wt_send

Send a message in an active conversation

wt_read

Read pending messages for this project

wt_list

List all conversations for this project

wt_status

Show status overview: pending messages, active conversations

wt_end

End a conversation

// known CVEs in dependencies4 high2 low

Disclosed vulnerabilities in this server's declared npm dependencies (via OSV). Whether each is reachable depends on the installed versions.

high@modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.12.1GHSA-345p-7cg4-v4c7

@modelcontextprotocol/sdk has cross-client data leak via shared server/transport instance reuse

high@modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.12.1GHSA-8r9q-7v3j-jr4g

Anthropic's MCP TypeScript SDK has a ReDoS vulnerability

high@modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.12.1GHSA-w48q-cv73-mx4w

Model Context Protocol (MCP) TypeScript SDK does not enable DNS rebinding protection by default

highws@8.18.0GHSA-96hv-2xvq-fx4p

ws: Memory exhaustion DoS from tiny fragments and data chunks

lowuuid@10.0.0GHSA-w5hq-g745-h8pq

uuid: Missing buffer bounds check in v3/v5/v6 when buf is provided

Depend on this server? Get alerted when its CVEs change.Watch this server free →
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configCLAUDE_CLI_PATH
configDISCORD_CHANNEL_ID
🔐 secretDISCORD_TOKEN
configIMPL_TIMEOUT_MS
configROUND_TIMEOUT_MS
configWEB_PORT
configWT_PROJECT_ID"": "my-project",
configWT_PROJECT_PATH"": "/path/to/my-project",
Deployment configuration, supplied by whoever hosts the server. Users are not asked for these.
deployREDIS_URL
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

7/7 tools missing one or more hints — wt_register (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); wt_start (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); wt_send (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +4 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Tool inputs are validated

6/7 tool handlers declare input schemas (86%)

Declare an inputSchema with zod/joi/yup on every tool definition.

Tool handlers catch errors

Only 2/7 tool handlers wrap calls in try/catch (29%)

Wrap each tool handler body in try/catch and return a structured error response.

Tests exist

No test files found

Add tests that exercise each declared tool.

Production dependencies are patched

0 critical, 4 high severity in production deps — @modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.12.1 (high), @modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.12.1 (high)

Run npm audit fix, or upgrade the affected packages to a non-vulnerable version.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 6 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Verified](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/inael/agent-walkie-talkie?variant=verified)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/inael/agent-walkie-talkie)
Shows verification status without the grade. Want the grade badge instead? Remove ?variant=verified from the URL.
commit: e70d0a6ef79fdc2fe22299c35729c1f5ac3cbf24
code hash: 6917196afb6fd8701422786edf4aa70613ad07da59c0ec43040df81f792a8126
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client