MCP Component Review (igorvieira/mcp-component-review) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 57 out of 100, grade D. It declares 7 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

D
Caution
57/100

MCP Component Review

Analyzes React component changes by performing structural analysis and generating visual diffs to identify pixel-level differences. It integrates with Figma to validate implementation compliance against design specifications and automates component reviews across git branches.

Caution. Specific findings reduced this grade. They are listed on the page. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

igorvieira

Source: Glama

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

Install from

The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.

// key findings
🚨
Known vulnerabilities in dependencies: 1 critical, 1 high
Affects packages this MCP installs at runtime. Upgrade or remove the affected dependency.
// tools this server exposes7 tools

These names and descriptions are the publisher's own, read from the source code. We print them as written. Our assessment is the findings above, not this list.

compare_components

Compare two React component files and get a structured diff showing changes in text, children, props, colors, spacing, and typography.

analyze_component

Analyze a single React component file and extract its structure, including component tree, props, and styles (Tailwind, styled-components, CSS modules).

visual_diff_components

Take screenshots of two React components and generate a visual diff image showing pixel-level differences. Returns paths to the generated images (old, new, diff, and combined side-by-side view).

get_figma_specs

Extract design specifications from a Figma component including colors, spacing (padding, margin, gap), typography (font-size, font-weight, line-height), and dimensions.

validate_design_implementation

Compare Figma design specs with a React component implementation. Returns a validation report showing matches, mismatches, and missing properties for colors, spacing, typography, and borders.

review_branch

Review all changed React components in a git branch. Analyzes structural changes, generates visual diffs, and optionally validates against Figma designs. Returns a comprehensive report.

validate_and_fix

Validate a React component against Figma specs and generate auto-fix instructions. If the component does not match the design, returns a detailed prompt with exact Tailwind/CSS changes needed. Use this to automatically fix design discrepancies.

// known CVEs in dependencies1 critical1 high1 low

Disclosed vulnerabilities in this server's declared npm dependencies (via OSV). Whether each is reachable depends on the installed versions.

critical@babel/traverse@7.23.0GHSA-67hx-6x53-jw92

Babel vulnerable to arbitrary code execution when compiling specifically crafted malicious code

high@modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.0.0GHSA-w48q-cv73-mx4w

Model Context Protocol (MCP) TypeScript SDK does not enable DNS rebinding protection by default

lowesbuild@0.24.0GHSA-67mh-4wv8-2f99

esbuild enables any website to send any requests to the development server and read the response

Depend on this server? Get alerted when its CVEs change.Watch this server free →
// quality suggestions

Dependencies

13 dependencies, 1 flagged: puppeteer

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

7/7 tools missing one or more hints — compare_components (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); analyze_component (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); visual_diff_components (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +4 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Tests exist

No test files found

Add tests that exercise each declared tool.

Shell command execution

7 child_process calls — runs shell commands

Prefer library functions over shell-outs. If you must shell out, ensure all inputs are properly escaped.

Production dependencies are patched

1 critical, 1 high severity in production deps — @babel/traverse@7.23.0 (critical), @modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.0.0 (high)

Run npm audit fix, or upgrade the affected packages to a non-vulnerable version.

Dependency freshness

1/8 production deps stale: pngjs@2023-02-20 (3.5y)

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 5 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Verified](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/igorvieira/mcp-component-review?variant=verified)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/igorvieira/mcp-component-review)
Shows verification status without the grade. Want the grade badge instead? Remove ?variant=verified from the URL.
commit: 7834d10a6f75524d7fbbdac8e191e351590dd1fb
code hash: ddcc29e2c471200a39de4c3e049168fa746c8d211fa5b4fa7f630ca11e32df02
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client