Generate Manual Test Cases (hueori95/mcp_manual_testcases) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. M8ven has not graded it: there is no public source to read and no endpoint we can reach, so there is nothing for us to inspect. No publisher has claimed this listing.

Back to MCP Trust Indexm8ven
C
Emerging
74/100
2 months ago

Generate Manual Test Cases

This MCP server provides a tool to generate manual test cases in Markdown or CSV format from documentation files and custom rules. It supports text and PDF inputs and can leverage LLM sampling to automate the creation of detailed test scenarios.

→ hueori95/mcp_manual_testcases· listed on glama

Emerging. No concerning findings. Grades remain capped until the project builds reputation through adoption. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

hueori95

Source: Glama

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

⚡ Connect GitHub for Live Monitored

Install from

Glama

M8ven verifies MCPs across every public registry — install directly from whichever one you prefer.

// key findings
✅
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
🔐
You'll be asked for 1 credential: OPENAI_API_KEY
These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configDOC_PATHPath to requirement document (default: samples/doc-example.md). PDF is supported.
🔐 secretOPENAI_API_KEYIf set, the script calls OpenAI to generate test cases.
configOPENAI_MODEL
configOUTPUT_CSV
configOUTPUT_FILEOutput file path. For CSV, default is samples/generated-testcases.csv.
configOUTPUT_FORMATprompt (default) or csv.
configOUTPUT_MD
configRULES_PATHPath to rules file (default: samples/rules-example.txt).
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

1/1 tools missing one or more hints — generate_testcases (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint). OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

License file

No license file

Add a LICENSE file (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.).

Tests exist

No test files found

Add tests that exercise each declared tool.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 4 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Score](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/hueori95-mcp-manual-testcases-o1mhaw)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/hueori95-mcp-manual-testcases-o1mhaw)
Shows your grade and updates automatically. Prefer no grade? Append ?variant=verified to the badge URL.
commit: 0466d7d0b618828ad19d5df5d6fbba45fef9c8d8
code hash: c4222e87f2b0d1208ca7fc2f9b5d8609d592ef83a012b3bb0e06bc03e5c1e699
verified: 6/12/2026, 11:26:09 AM
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client