Ghidra MCP Bridge (Hao17/LiteGhidraMCP) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 74 out of 100, grade C. It declares 14 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

Back to MCP Trust IndexM8ven
C
Emerging
74/100
9 days ago

Ghidra MCP Bridge

A PyGhidra-based MCP server that exposes Ghidra's reverse engineering capabilities to AI agents, enabling binary analysis via tools like overview, search, view, list, edit, script execution, and version control.

→ Hao17/LiteGhidraMCP· listed on glama

Emerging. No concerning findings. Grades remain capped until the project builds reputation through adoption. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

Hao17

Source: Glama

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

⚡ Connect GitHub for Live Monitored

Install from

Glama

M8ven verifies MCPs across every public registry — install directly from whichever one you prefer.

// key findings
✅
14 tools verified — handlers match their declared behaviour
4 read-only tools verified — handlers contain no write/delete/exec
✅
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configGHIDRA_MCP_HOST
configGHIDRA_MCP_PORT
configGHIDRA_MCP_SSE_PORT
configPROJECT_MODE
configPROJECT_PATH
configPROJECT_NAME
configPROGRAM_NAME
configGHIDRA_SERVER_HOST
configGHIDRA_SERVER_PORT
configGHIDRA_SERVER_USER
configGHIDRA_SERVER_KEYSTORE
configGHIDRA_SERVER_REPO
configIMPORT_BINARY_NAME
configGHIDRA_MCP_PYTHON
configAUTO_ANALYZE
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

6/14 tools have annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

14/14 tools missing one or more hints — ghidra_search (missing: destructiveHint, idempotentHint); ghidra_view (missing: destructiveHint, idempotentHint); ghidra_list (missing: destructiveHint, idempotentHint), +11 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

License file

No license file

Add a LICENSE file (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.).

Tool test coverage

Only 1/14 tools referenced in tests (7%)

Write tests that reference each tool by name so every tool has at least one test.

Secrets not logged

2 secret values sent to print

Redact or omit secret values from log output.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 5 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Score](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/hao17/liteghidramcp)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/hao17/liteghidramcp)
Shows your grade and updates automatically. Prefer no grade? Append ?variant=verified to the badge URL.
commit: ca5ccd768bc878206ed6c06bc3299c8eddad9801
code hash: ec3a90eeebdfbce1e53212d765d701e9c6070ae6d5b0a595c8a645fdf1fae5b3
verified: 9/1/2026, 6:40:42 PM
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client