Mcp-worker (GuyMichaely/Mcp-worker) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. M8ven has not graded it: we have no way to read this server ourselves. No publisher has claimed this listing.

C
Caution
63/100
6 days ago

Mcp-worker

Enables ChatGPT to securely control a single authorized Windows worker through an MCP endpoint, handling job scheduling, approval, and execution with outbound-only connectivity.

Caution. Specific findings reduced this grade. They are listed on the page. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

GuyMichaely

Source: Glama

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

Install from

M8ven verifies MCPs across every public registry — install directly from whichever one you prefer.

// key findings
⚠️
Tests do not pass
Either the test suite is broken or the code regressed. Either way the published behaviour can’t be verified by the publisher’s own tests.
32 tools verified — handlers match their declared behaviour
13 read-only tools verified — handlers contain no write/delete/exec
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
🔐
You'll be asked for 1 credential: LOCAL_MCP_BEARER_TOKEN
These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configCHATGPT_MACHINE_MCP_HOME
🔐 secretLOCAL_MCP_BEARER_TOKEN
configWINDIR
// quality suggestions

All four hints declared on every tool

29/32 tools missing one or more hints — machine_status (missing: idempotentHint); policy_explain (missing: idempotentHint); desktop_status (missing: idempotentHint), +26 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Destructive tools are labelled

2 tools perform destructive updates without destructiveHint — fs_move deletes at line 289 (fs.rmSync(destination, { recursive: true, force: true })); file_import deletes at line 343 (fs.rmSync(temporary, { force: true }))

Add destructiveHint:true to any tool whose handler calls .delete(), .upsert(), .update(), unlink, rm, DELETE, DROP, REPLACE INTO, or any operation that overwrites existing data.

openWorldHint matches behaviour

1 tool claims openWorldHint=false but make outbound HTTP — file_import → dynamic (line 337)

Either flip openWorldHint to true (acknowledging external reach) or refactor the handler to avoid outbound HTTP. If the only network calls are to a known fixed endpoint that you consider part of the tool itself, document that and keep openWorldHint=false; otherwise true is honest.

License file

No license file

Add a LICENSE file (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.).

Tool test coverage

Only 5/32 tools referenced in tests (16%)

Write tests that reference each tool by name so every tool has at least one test.

Tests pass

npm test failed — tests do not pass

Make sure npm test runs cleanly. Common cause: missing build step or missing env vars.

Domain consistency

npm scope @mcp-worker doesn't match GitHub owner guymichaely

Use the same org name across GitHub, npm, and your homepage so users can verify the publisher.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 7 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Verified](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/guymichaely-mcp-worker-yz3upa?variant=verified)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/guymichaely-mcp-worker-yz3upa)
Shows verification status without the grade. Want the grade badge instead? Remove ?variant=verified from the URL.
commit: 63cf60950c68c1dbe09c76edbd6123dc4d27e79a
code hash: c776e7ee47dd836b079aa5d87babf5b87eabe14f2bd0b358f6a78ad92a5f7cd2
verified: 9/2/2026, 5:19:13 PM
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client